Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Networking capabilities of IEEE 802.11s and IEEE 802.11ah systems

Fayyaz, Muhammad Ather (2016)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Muhammad Ather Fayyaz Thesis for MSc IT (5.462Mt)
Lataukset: 



Fayyaz, Muhammad Ather
2016

Master's Degree Programme in Information Technology
Tieto- ja sähkötekniikan tiedekunta - Faculty of Computing and Electrical Engineering
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Hyväksymispäivämäärä
2016-12-07
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tty-201611244793
Tiivistelmä
Internet of Things was considered a new technology couple of years ago but with the speed at which technologies are improving and being implemented, we can see IoT devices and platforms already in market. But sadly, there is still no concensus on how these devices would unanimously commmunicate with each other. Thankfully IEEE 802.11ah brings up a unanimous and unique way for all these devices to communicate and coexist on lower 2 layers of OSI model. 802.11ah can communicate with other networking protocols as well and interestingly, dedicated Application layer protocols for IoT (COAP) are also being implemented these days. IEEE 802.11ah is simulated in this thesis and also the relaying option from the draft is implemented.
IEEE 802.11s mesh on the other hand is rather old technology but still serves the purpose really well and is implemented in various situations. Because of nice and detailed networking infrastructure of IEEE 802.11s mesh, this protocol is studied and simulated in this thesis. However, to make the scenario closer to IoT use case, only stationary devices are used and hence Proactive networking protocols of Mesh are deemed better suited. We analyse the networking bits of both these technologies in this thesis to see if they can coexist and cooperate.
In the end, we mention the performance of these technologies and propose some future enhancements.
Kokoelmat
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto [43034]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste