Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Semantic Interoperability in electronic health record: a standardised approach

Ye, Ruibin (2015)

 
Avaa tiedosto
GRADU-1438324939.pdf (2.446Mt)
Lataukset: 



Ye, Ruibin
2015

MDP in Software Development
Informaatiotieteiden yksikkö - School of Information Sciences
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Hyväksymispäivämäärä
2015-06-15
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:uta-201507312195
Tiivistelmä
The main objective of this study is to compare two major international standardisation approaches that enable semantic interoperability in electronic health record (EHR) , to identify harmonisation efforts between the two approaches and to suggest possibilities on future harmonisation.
Archetypes and HL7 are the two major approaches in current Electronic Health Record development, but their approaches to semantic interoperability are very different. Many countries, organisations, and companies have adopted the overlapping approaches. It is very difficult for systems adopting different approaches to communicate. Harmonisation is one possible way other than replacing each other to settle this issue.

The thesis first presents overviews on semantic interoperability in information system, electronic health records and international interoperability standards. Then, detail studies in the two approaches are conducted by reviewing articles and international standards. A set of prerequisites of semantic interoperability is used to evaluate the approaches. Finally, differences between the two approaches and harmonisation efforts are identified.

The result suggests that both approach are sufficient to support semantic interoperability. Despite their incompatibility harmonisation efforts have appeared to alleviate the problem. Further harmonisation is essential and experiences may be adopted from other industries.
Kokoelmat
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto [36437]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste