Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • Artikkelit
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • Artikkelit
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

How is the most severe health state being valued by the general population?

Gandhi, Mihir; Thumboo, Julian; Wee, Hwee-Lin; Nan, Luo; Cheung, Yin Bun (2014)

 
Avaa tiedosto
how_is_the_most_2014.pdf (269.7Kt)
Lataukset: 



Gandhi, Mihir
Thumboo, Julian
Wee, Hwee-Lin
Nan, Luo
Cheung, Yin Bun
2014

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 12
161
Lääketieteen yksikkö - School of Medicine
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0161-9
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:uta-201411182326

Kuvaus

BioMed Central open access
Tiivistelmä
Background

It has been reported that valuation of health states that are close to death, such as the most severe health state, can be affected by health state valuation procedure, and their utility values are difficult to predict. We examined how the most severe health states of Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) and EuroQoL-5 dimension-3 level (EQ-5D-3L) were valued by the Singapore general population.
Methods

Overall, 249 SF-6D and 42 EQ-5D-3L states were valued by two separate samples from the Singapore general population using the visual analogue scale (VAS) method. Ordinary least-square regression model was employed to explain deficit in the valuation of the most severe state using the health state descriptors.
Results

A total of 1021 participants from the SF-6D sample and 1015 participants from the EQ-5D-3L sample were included in the analysis. We observed that 67% of the SF-6D participants and 74% of the EQ-5D-3L participants considered the most severe state worse than dead. The most severe state had mean VAS valuation scores more than 20–25 points lower than the adjacent states that are better by only one level in only one dimension. SF-6D VAS valuation score for the most severe state was 27 points and 12 points lower than expected according to the health state descriptors among the participants who considered the most severe state worse than dead and better than dead, respectively. Similar results were found for the EQ-5D-3L valuation.
Conclusions

The most severe health state was valued lower than expected according to its descriptors.
Kokoelmat
  • Artikkelit [6122]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste