Beginners Performance with MessagEase and QWERTY
THAPA, ANJU (2013)
2013
Vuorovaikutteinen teknologia - Interactive Technology
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Hyväksymispäivämäärä
2013-06-24
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:uta-1-23903
http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:uta-1-23903
Tiivistelmä
With the increased use of mobile phones, interest in text entry with them has also amplified. Many new mobile phones are equipped with a QWERTY keypad; new methods to surpass the QWERTY performance are also being developed.
This thesis compares user performance of virtual QWERTY keypad to MessagEase. MessagEase uses 9 keys and can therefore be used even on very small touch displays. 9 characters are entered with tapping and the rest with a tap-and-slide gesture.
An experiment was conducted with 10 participants transcribing text with both text entry techniques. The experiment consisted of three sessions. In each session, the participants transcribed 30 phrases in total - 15 phrases using each text entry technique. Responses to the System Usability Scale (SUS) for each text entry technique and informal interview data were also collected.
From a Repeated-measures analysis of variance a significant effect of the text entry method on text entry rate was seen (F1,19= 47.140, p < 0.0001). The effect of the session (i.e. learning) was also statistically significant (F2,18= 3.631, p = 0.047).The interaction of the session and method was also statistically significant (F2,18= 10.286, p = 0.001) indicating different learning rates. Average text entry speed with MessagEase was 7.43 words per minute (wpm) in the first session and 10.96 wpm in the third session. Likewise, text entry speed with the QWERTY soft keyboard was 17.75 wpm in the first session and 17.16 wpm in the third session. No significant difference was found in the error rates.
Keywords: text entry method, MessagEase, QWERTY
This thesis compares user performance of virtual QWERTY keypad to MessagEase. MessagEase uses 9 keys and can therefore be used even on very small touch displays. 9 characters are entered with tapping and the rest with a tap-and-slide gesture.
An experiment was conducted with 10 participants transcribing text with both text entry techniques. The experiment consisted of three sessions. In each session, the participants transcribed 30 phrases in total - 15 phrases using each text entry technique. Responses to the System Usability Scale (SUS) for each text entry technique and informal interview data were also collected.
From a Repeated-measures analysis of variance a significant effect of the text entry method on text entry rate was seen (F1,19= 47.140, p < 0.0001). The effect of the session (i.e. learning) was also statistically significant (F2,18= 3.631, p = 0.047).The interaction of the session and method was also statistically significant (F2,18= 10.286, p = 0.001) indicating different learning rates. Average text entry speed with MessagEase was 7.43 words per minute (wpm) in the first session and 10.96 wpm in the third session. Likewise, text entry speed with the QWERTY soft keyboard was 17.75 wpm in the first session and 17.16 wpm in the third session. No significant difference was found in the error rates.
Keywords: text entry method, MessagEase, QWERTY