Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The impact of symptoms and illness insight on treatment adherence in first-episode psychosis: a one-year follow-up study using therapeutic drug monitoring

Leijala, Juhani; Kampman, Olli; Gunnar, Teemu; Suvisaari, Jaana (2026)

 
Avaa tiedosto
The_impact_of_symptoms_and_illness_insight_on_treatment_adherence_in_first-episode_psychosis.pdf (1.141Mt)
Lataukset: 



Leijala, Juhani
Kampman, Olli
Gunnar, Teemu
Suvisaari, Jaana
2026

BMC Psychiatry
690
doi:10.1186/s12888-026-08301-9
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202609159756

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background: Despite extensive research on adherence in first-episode psychosis (FEP), reliance on self-report or clinician judgment has limited accuracy and obscured nuanced clinical associations. Objective: This longitudinal study examined the predictive value of psychopathology, insight, and functioning for objectively measured treatment adherence across a one-year follow-up using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods: Seventy-eight FEP patients were assessed at baseline, 2 months, and 12 months. Clinical measures included the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), and the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight–Expanded version (SAI-E). Adherence was defined by comparing plasma antipsychotic concentrations to prescribed doses according to international consensus guidelines. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to model time-dependent associations. Results: While overall adherence declined, time alone was not a significant predictor. Instead, current positive symptom severity (approximately 4–5% lower odds of adherence per BPRS point) was associated with lower odds of adherence, while prior non-adherence predicted subsequent adherence. In contrast, insight, negative symptoms, and functioning showed no consistent association with adherence. A marginal association between improved functioning and better adherence was observed at 12 months. Conclusions: Adherence in FEP appears to fluctuate in relation to current clinical state rather than follow a stable linear pattern. These findings highlight the value of objective TDM monitoring and early intervention, supporting predictive models that incorporate evolving symptom patterns rather than static baseline measures. Trial registration: Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [26236]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste