Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Are energy communities a viable policy instrument for battling energy poverty? A country comparison

Laitinen, Jasmin; Valta, Jussi; Castaño-Rosa, Raúl (2026)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Are_energy_communities_a_viable_policy_instrument_for_battling_energy_poverty_A_country_comparison_EEM26_Final_submission.pdf (208.8Kt)
Lataukset: 



Laitinen, Jasmin
Valta, Jussi
Castaño-Rosa, Raúl
2026

This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
doi:10.1109/EEM68581.2026.11589700
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202609019422

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
While the energy transition seeks to deliver sustainable solutions for society, it does not automatically ensure equality. Energy poverty (i.e., households’ lack of access to essential energy services needed to achieve a decent standard of living) remains a widespread phenomenon across all European Union (EU) member states. The manifestations of energy poverty (EP) vary significantly and require solutions tailored to the specific contexts in which they occur. Energy communities (ECs), enhancing community participation and economic benefits for their members, present opportunities to reduce EP. In this paper, we compare EC models and their potential to address EP in three EU member states, located in different geographies: Finland, Poland, and Spain. Our research question is: How do different types of ECs in the European Union contribute to alleviating EP in their specific contexts? First, existing scientific literature on ECs and EP in Europe was reviewed along with regulatory and policy documents. A comparative study was conducted after data collection and analysis. Results showed that the role of contextual factors and actors is often overlooked in defining EC models, which also in turn reduces EP alleviation potential. Concluding remarks with policy implications are provided.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [25732]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste