Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparative analysis of BLE SIG mesh and Wirepas mesh for Ad Hoc IoT deployments: Features, security, efficiency and application suitability

Waheed, Muhammad Zeeshan; Sohrab, Fahad; Qaim, Waleed Bin; Vakkuri, Matti; Okkonen, Jyrki; Valkama, Mikko; Gabbouj, Moncef (2026)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Comparative_analysis_of_BLE_SIG_mesh_and_Wirepas_mesh_for_Ad_Hoc_IoT_deployments.pdf (909.9Kt)
Lataukset: 



Waheed, Muhammad Zeeshan
Sohrab, Fahad
Qaim, Waleed Bin
Vakkuri, Matti
Okkonen, Jyrki
Valkama, Mikko
Gabbouj, Moncef
2026

Ad Hoc Networks
104335
doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2026.104335
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202607228401

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
The rapid increase in the number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has led to the development of advanced networking technologies such as bluetooth low energy (BLE) standardized by special interest group (SIG) mesh and Wirepas mesh networks. Each of these technologies offers unique features and capabilities. BLE is a widely used short-range technology that has made a significant impact on the IoT paradigm development thanks to its simplicity, low power consumption, robustness, and low cost. In contrast, Wirepas mesh is a decentralized wireless communication protocol, meaning that each node in the network selects its own role while maintaining and optimizing the connection automatically based on its environment. This paper provides a comparative analysis of BLE SIG mesh and Wirepas mesh, focusing on their security, scalability, power, and memory efficiency, as well as application suitability in diverse ad hoc IoT environments. The study highlights that while BLE SIG mesh benefits from easy adoption, low power consumption, and ease of integration into the consumer IoT ecosystem, Wirepas mesh excels in high-density, large-scale industrial applications due to its robust management and decentralized control. Security is realized in BLE SIG mesh with standard authentication and encryption, whereas Wirepas mesh utilizes deployment-configurable security mechanisms to handle diverse network topologies. This comparative review enables IoT industrialists and researchers to select appropriate mesh technologies based on their specific requirements and deployment constraints.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [26203]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste