Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Cancer detection in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)

Pasanen, Niko; Talala, Kirsi; Remmers, Sebastiaan; Tammela, Teuvo L.J.; Hugosson, Jonas; Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud; Taari, Kimmo; Bangma, Chris; Hond, Elly Den; Nelen, Vera; Wyler, Stephen; Kwiatkowski, Maciej; Puliti, Donella; Gorini, Giuseppe; Gonzàlez, Luis; Lujan, Marcos; Roobol, Monique J.; Auvinen, Anssi (2026)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Cancer_detection_in_the_European_Randomised_Study_of_Screening_for_Prostate_Cancer.pdf (357.6Kt)
Lataukset: 



Pasanen, Niko
Talala, Kirsi
Remmers, Sebastiaan
Tammela, Teuvo L.J.
Hugosson, Jonas
Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud
Taari, Kimmo
Bangma, Chris
Hond, Elly Den
Nelen, Vera
Wyler, Stephen
Kwiatkowski, Maciej
Puliti, Donella
Gorini, Giuseppe
Gonzàlez, Luis
Lujan, Marcos
Roobol, Monique J.
Auvinen, Anssi
2026

BJU International
doi:10.1111/bju.70380
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202607228408

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Objectives: To provide a comprehensive analysis regarding outcomes of repeated screening and detection of low-grade versus high-grade cancer from the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Materials and Methods: This study analysed men aged 55–69 years at random across the ERSPC trial centres except France. Men in the screening arm were classified as ever-attenders (who attended at least one screening cycle) or non-attenders (who did not attend a specific screening cycle). Cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated by age group and centre across three screening cycles. A secondary analysis incorporated interval prostate cancer (PCa) cases—those diagnosed outside the screening protocol—among both ever-attenders and non-attenders. Incidence data from the control arm were included for comparison. Results: Based on screen-detected cases, CDRs were consistently higher for low-grade than for intermediate- and high-grade cases across all centres and screening cycles. Trends in CDRs for high-grade cases varied by centre: CDRs decreased from the first to the second cycle and increased again during the third cycle in most centres, whereas CDRs increased in Spain with each successive screening cycle. Conclusion: The ERSPC data show a decreasing detection rate for low-grade cancer and substantial variation in the detection rate for intermediate- and high-grade cancer between centres across repeated screening rounds. Increasing interval and non-attender cancers indicate diminishing effectiveness of uniform screening schedules. These findings support personalised screening approaches and improved strategies to maintain participation.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [26236]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste