Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Stuttering and career: Shaping professional paths amid restrictions

Nissinen, Johanna; Stevanovic, Melisa; Pirinen, Veera; Penttilä, Nelly (2026-09)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Stuttering_and_career_Shaping_professional_paths_amid_restrictions.pdf (744.2Kt)
Lataukset: 



Nissinen, Johanna
Stevanovic, Melisa
Pirinen, Veera
Penttilä, Nelly
09 / 2026

Journal of Fluency Disorders
106234
doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2026.106234
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202607098304

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Purpose Stuttering can significantly influence individuals’ career trajectories through mechanisms such as role entrapment, occupational segregation, job dissatisfaction, and stigma-based discrimination. In professional contexts where verbal fluency is narrowly defined and highly valued, people who stutter (PWS) may face systemic barriers. This study examines how PWS experience, interpret, and negotiate the role of stuttering in recruitment processes, career choices, job roles and opportunities for advancement. Method An online survey and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) were used to examine responses from 45 Finnish-speaking adults who stutter and have work experience. Results Participants described restrictive workplace speech norms and expectations of fluency as key constraints that generated cognitive and emotional load. Many reported that stuttering had influenced their career pathways, including not entering preferred fields, although its perceived influence on occupational choices had lessened over time. Speaking-intensive tasks—such as phone work, presentations, and spontaneous verbal interaction—were identified as the most challenging. Fluent speakers were often perceived as gatekeepers who informally determined which roles were considered suitable for PWS, though some participants also self-restricted their job tasks. Experiences were highly situational, and a minority reported positive or empowering aspects of stuttering at work. Conclusion The study concludes that discrimination often stems not from actual ability but from biased expectations and rigid norms surrounding fluent speech. These norms delay access to preferred professions and constrain career development. Promoting inclusion requires challenging dominant communication standards and recognizing diverse communicative competencies. Enhancing awareness and visibility of PWS in professional environments is essential for systemic change.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [25343]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste