Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Digital technologies and economic abuse in intimate relationships: perceptions of clinical professionals who work with victim-survivors of violence in Finland

Kaittila, Anniina; Tihveräinen, Sonja; Hietamäki, Johanna; Tuominen, Jarno; Nipuli, Suvi; Kangas-Kalinen, Annamari; Nyqvist, Leo; Husso, Marita (2026)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Digital_technologies_and_economic_abuse_in_intimate_relationships_perceptions_of_clinical_professionals_who_work_with_victim-survivors_of_violence_in.pdf (650.0Kt)
Lataukset: 



Kaittila, Anniina
Tihveräinen, Sonja
Hietamäki, Johanna
Tuominen, Jarno
Nipuli, Suvi
Kangas-Kalinen, Annamari
Nyqvist, Leo
Husso, Marita
2026

Nordic Social Work Research
doi:10.1080/2156857X.2026.2677880
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202607078199

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
In recent decades, the management of economic affairs has largely transitioned to digital platforms. Electronic identification and online money management have not only simplified individuals’ daily lives but have also introduced new methods for financially harming one’s partner or ex-partner. This study explores the various types of digitally facilitated economic abuse (DFEA) reported by clinical professionals who work with victim-survivors of violence. The data consist of 102 open-ended survey responses and four focus group interviews conducted with 15 participants. The findings suggest that DFEA can be categorized into two main types: digitally facilitated economic exploitation and digitally facilitated economic control. Digitally facilitated economic exploitation encompasses three distinct forms: The perpetrator (1) steals the victim’s money, (2) uses the victim’s identity to obtain financial benefits or (3) threatens to inflict financial harm. By contrast, digitally facilitated economic control involves 1) dominating victims of violence by taking control of their finances or 2) surveilling them through digital platforms, such as their online banking or loyalty card accounts. The motivation behind these actions differs from that of economic exploitation; it is not primarily for financial gain but rather a desire for control. Based on the findings of this study, there is a pressing need to critically examine digital practices and platforms to mitigate the potential for abuse. Preventing DFEA requires collaboration among a range of societal actors, including social and healthcare service providers, policymakers, law enforcement, prosecutors and financial and technology institutions.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [25354]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste