Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of ice adhesion measured with centrifugal and pushing ice adhesion tests

Khan, Kamil; Kandelin, Niklas; Jokinen, Jarno; Koivuluoto, Heli (2026-07)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Comparison_of_ice_adhesion.pdf (4.686Mt)
Lataukset: 



Khan, Kamil
Kandelin, Niklas
Jokinen, Jarno
Koivuluoto, Heli
07 / 2026

Cold Regions Science and Technology
104945
doi:10.1016/j.coldregions.2026.104945
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202605054976

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Ice accretion and especially ice adhesion greatly influence the performance of different surfaces, materials and structures in many industrial applications, e.g., in aviation, energy and transportation. To reduce ice adhesion, surface engineering plays a crucial role in developing sustainable solutions by tailoring the surface properties. The number of studies on improving and developing anti-icing surfaces and coatings are continuously increasing. Ice adhesion testing methods are used for evaluating de-icing capability of materials and coatings. However, the characterization of ice adhesion strength using standard methods is still lacking. In this research, we focus on investigation of ice adhesion of aluminium alloys and flame sprayed polyethylene coatings with two different ice adhesion test methods: centrifugal ice adhesion test (CAT) and pushing ice adhesion test (PAT). The aim is to compare these test methods using similar ice accretion method and ice type on tested surfaces. An impact ice as a form of mixed glaze ice was accreted by using supercooled water droplets in the icing wind tunnel. This mimics natural ice formation in outdoor conditions. Ice adhesions measured with CAT were higher compared to PAT, which indicates importance to find test specific criteria for ice adhesion levels and icephobicity indicators. Moreover, coated surfaces showed lower ice adhesion, below 100 kPa, with both methods showing their potential as icephobic coatings to be used in de-icing applications. Ice adhesion tests were modelled using finite element method to analyse their stress distributions. Wettability and surface roughness were also evaluated to correlate surface and material properties to icing performance.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [24324]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste