Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Evaluation of level 2 probabilistic risk assessment release calculations for Olkiluoto units 1 and 2 Using MELCOR : Time-dependent Cs-137 release calculations during severe accident progression

Herpin, Antoine (2026)

 
Avaa tiedosto
HerpinAntoine.pdf (9.998Mt)
Lataukset: 



Herpin, Antoine
2026

Teknis-luonnontieteellinen DI-ohjelma - Master's Programme in Science and Engineering
Tekniikan ja luonnontieteiden tiedekunta - Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Hyväksymispäivämäärä
2026-04-22
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202604224167
Tiivistelmä
This thesis evaluates the Level 2 PRA source term modelling methodology for selected severe accident sequences at Olkiluoto units 1 and 2 by comparing it with corresponding MELCOR analyses. Because MELCOR simulations are case-specific and largely deterministic, whereas Level 2 PRA source term models are more abstract and uncertainty-based, direct comparison requires careful alignment of the accident scenarios.
A stepwise time-dependent source term model was implemented in Python to reproduce sequence-specific Level 2 PRA release calculations and to compare releases from the reactor pressure vessel and primary circuit, from containment, and to the environment. The analysis focused on caesium-137 and covered five representative severe accident cases.
The results support conditional, sequence-specific agreement under carefully matched assumptions, but they do not constitute a general validation of the full Level 2 PRA release calculation chain. The closest agreement was generally obtained for the 24h release from the reactor pressure vessel and primary circuit, while larger discrepancies were observed for releases from containment and especially to the environment. The main differences were associated with non-equivalent boundary conditions, such as assumptions related to leakage paths, venting, and recovery actions.
The study shows that sequence-specific comparison between MELCOR and Level 2 PRA is meaningful only when the accident progression assumptions are carefully constrained and interpreted transparently.
Kokoelmat
  • Opinnäytteet - ylempi korkeakoulututkinto [43232]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste