Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Recent Advances in Complexity Reduction Methods for VVC Inter coding, A Review

ShahHosseini, Komeil; Javadtalab, Abbas; Ghanbari, Mohammad; Kalhor, Ahmad; Pakdaman, Farhad; Gabbouj, Moncef (2025-12-04)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Recent_Advances_in_Complexity_Reduction_Methods_for_VVC_Inter_Coding_A_Review.pdf (4.453Mt)
Lataukset: 



ShahHosseini, Komeil
Javadtalab, Abbas
Ghanbari, Mohammad
Kalhor, Ahmad
Pakdaman, Farhad
Gabbouj, Moncef
04.12.2025

IEEE Access
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3640436
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202601161535

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Video traffic continues to surge, pushing codecs toward higher efficiency at the cost of sharply increased complexity. The H.266/Versatile Video Coding (VVC) standard roughly halves bitrate relative to HEVC at comparable quality but increases encoder complexity substantially. This paper surveys algorithm-level complexity-reduction methods for VVC inter-frame coding, grouping them by decision module—coding unit (CU) partitioning, inter-mode selection, and motion estimation (ME)—and by approach—heuristic/statistical, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL). We provide quantitative comparisons of reported complexity–efficiency trade-offs (encoder time vs. BD-rate), and discuss observed trends and potential areas for improvement. Across the literature, CU partitioning is the most heavily targeted module, followed by ME; reported encoder time savings span approximately 10–55% with typically no more than about 3% BD-rate increase, depending on module and method. It is observed that DL methods generally achieve the largest time savings (often around 50% or higher) by predicting partition structures or mode decisions end-to-end, at the expense of training data and inference cost. Heuristic methods remain lightweight and hardware-friendly with small BD-rate impact, and ML methods provide balanced trade-offs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive survey of VVC inter-frame coding, distilling practical lessons and outlining open directions—especially hybrid pipelines that combine inexpensive filters with learned predictors—to guide more efficient VVC implementations and future standards.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [24199]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste