Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Single-item patient enablement instrument (PEI-Q2) as a feedback tool in primary healthcare: a qualitative study among Finnish primary care physicians

Tiihonen, Ida; Koskela, Tuomas; Tahkola, Aapo; Tolvanen, Elina (2025-11-14)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Single-item_patient_enablement_instrument_PEI-Q2_as_a_feedback_tool_in_primary_healthcare.pdf (436.8Kt)
Lataukset: 



Tiihonen, Ida
Koskela, Tuomas
Tahkola, Aapo
Tolvanen, Elina
14.11.2025

BJGP open
doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0126
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202601091236

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
BACKGROUND: In Finland, the gathering of patient feedback using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI), is recommended to assess the quality of care. However, knowledge of how this feedback could be utilized by the individual primary care practitioner (PCP) is sparse.AIM: To explore PCPs' experiences of the single-item Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI-Q2) as a feedback tool.DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative study in Finnish primary healthcare.METHOD: Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 14 PCPs in spring 2023 in Central Finland after they had received feedback with the PEI-Q2. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.RESULTS: PCPs regarded patient enablement as an important indicator of care quality in primary healthcare. The feedback provided through the PEI-Q2 was generally perceived as encouraging and motivating, prompting requests for its regular use. However, several PCPs found the feedback challenging to interpret. Feedback with the PEI-Q2 was seen as a promising tool for managerial benchmarking. Additionally, PCPs suggested that the utility of the PEI-Q2 feedback could be enhanced by incorporating supplementary contextual information, such as open-ended feedback.CONCLUSION: From the PCPs' viewpoint, the PEI-Q2 appears to be a potential tool for delivering patient feedback. While it can serve as a measure for assessing quality of care, it should be complemented with other patient-reported feedback tools to enhance its overall applicability and usefulness. In addition, educational guidance on interpreting the measure's results is recommended.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [22734]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste