Conformal Prediction For Financial Time Series Under Asset Pricing Models
Cocouvi, Judicael Marvic (2025)
Cocouvi, Judicael Marvic
2025
Master's Programme in Computing Sciences and Electrical Engineering
Informaatioteknologian ja viestinnän tiedekunta - Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Hyväksymispäivämäärä
2025-12-23
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-2025122212079
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-2025122212079
Tiivistelmä
While numerous statistical approaches for uncertainty quantification have been proposed, most rely on parametric assumptions that are often violated in financial markets, and research on distribution-free variability estimation remains limited. We explore the application of conformal prediction methods to financial time series and provide a comprehensive comparison with classical econometric techniques for constructing stock return prediction intervals.
The conformal prediction methods examined include Inductive Conformal Prediction, Ensemble Batch Prediction Intervals, Mondrian Conformal Prediction, and Time-Weighted Conformal Prediction. These distribution-free approaches are systematically compared against classical parametric methods, comprising Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent robust ordinary least squares and GARCH-based dynamic conditional heteroskedasticity intervals. The evaluation employs both the Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Fama-French three-factor model as empirical testing frameworks, using daily return data from four securities representing diverse market characteristics: NVIDIA Corporation, Alphabet Inc., JPMorgan Chase \& Co., and The Coca-Cola Company.
Inductive Conformal Prediction (ICP) provides robust coverage but wider intervals, while adaptive methods trade reliability for efficiency. Classical volatility models remain competitive, and multi-factor frameworks improve moderate-volatility performance but weaken coverage for highly volatile assets.
The conformal prediction methods examined include Inductive Conformal Prediction, Ensemble Batch Prediction Intervals, Mondrian Conformal Prediction, and Time-Weighted Conformal Prediction. These distribution-free approaches are systematically compared against classical parametric methods, comprising Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent robust ordinary least squares and GARCH-based dynamic conditional heteroskedasticity intervals. The evaluation employs both the Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Fama-French three-factor model as empirical testing frameworks, using daily return data from four securities representing diverse market characteristics: NVIDIA Corporation, Alphabet Inc., JPMorgan Chase \& Co., and The Coca-Cola Company.
Inductive Conformal Prediction (ICP) provides robust coverage but wider intervals, while adaptive methods trade reliability for efficiency. Classical volatility models remain competitive, and multi-factor frameworks improve moderate-volatility performance but weaken coverage for highly volatile assets.
