Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A comparison of anthropometric indicators in predicting the incidence of diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia in Finland: a 22-year observational study

Lybeck, Julia; Tuomilehto, Jaakko; Saramies, Jouko; Koiranen, Markku; Uusitalo, Hannu; Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, Sirkka; Suija, Kadri (2025)

 
Avaa tiedosto
A_comparison_of_anthropometric_indicators_in_predicting_the_incidence_of_diabetes_and_intermediate_hyperglycaemia_in_Finland.pdf (1.199Mt)
Lataukset: 



Lybeck, Julia
Tuomilehto, Jaakko
Saramies, Jouko
Koiranen, Markku
Uusitalo, Hannu
Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, Sirkka
Suija, Kadri
2025

BMC Public Health
3879
doi:10.1186/s12889-025-25071-3
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-2025121611731

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background: Given the rising global prevalence of obesity and its strong association with type 2 diabetes, this study aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various anthropometric indicators in predicting the incidence of type 2 diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia (IH) over a 22-year period. Due to the limitations of body mass index as a predictive marker, the study assesses alternative metrics, including waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist circumference (WC), and relative fat mass (RFM), to determine their predictive power for type 2 diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia. Methods: The cohort comprised 1168 adults (aged ≥ 50 years) from Savitaipale, Finland. Data collection included clinical and laboratory assessments and questionnaires at baseline and at the 10-, and 22-year follow-ups. The incidence of type 2 diabetes and IH was assessed via a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test and health care registry data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) metrics were used to evaluate the predictive power of each indicator, stratified by sex. Results: WHR had the highest predictive accuracy for type 2 diabetes in men (AUC = 0.70), whereas RFM and WHtR were equally predictive in women (AUC = 0.68). For IH, RFM and WHR were most predictive in men, and WHtR in women. Combining multiple indicators improved the sensitivity of type 2 diabetes prediction. Conclusions: Alternative anthropometric indicators offer comparable predictive value and show potential for individualised type 2 diabetes and IH risk assessment. Sex-specific cutoffs and a multi-indicator approach could be used to improve screening and early intervention strategies, potentially improving public health management of diabetes risk.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [24322]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste