Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Change, continuity, and decision-making in the transition to old-age retirement from work and day activity services: Qualitative longitudinal follow-up

Granö, Sirpa; Tiilikainen, Elisa; Miettinen, Sonja; Kontu, Elina (2025)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Change_continuity_and_decision-making_in_the_transition_to_old-age_retirement_from_work_and_day_activity_services_qualitative_longitudinal_follow-u.pdf (649.3Kt)
Lataukset: 



Granö, Sirpa
Tiilikainen, Elisa
Miettinen, Sonja
Kontu, Elina
2025

International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
2557076
doi:10.1080/17482631.2025.2557076
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202509229416

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Purpose: To increase understanding of the transition from work and day activity services to old-age retirement among people with intellectual disabilities. The research questions are: 1) How are change and continuity present in the transitions to old-age retirement of older people with an intellectual disability? 2) What is the role of the person’s own decision-making in the transition process?Methods: A longitudinal case study approach was used. The main data consist of qualitative interviews from a one-year period with four people with an intellectual disability aged 59–65. Secondary data include photographs taken by the participants and the researcher’s field notes. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.Results: The transition from day activity services to retirement appeared to be fluid and unexpected. Only one of the participants retired during the follow-up as planned, because another’s retirement was postponed and two others moved back and forth between retirement and work and day activities. The participants had limited decision-making opportunities in the transition-process, while staff emphasised supporting continuity.Conclusions: Recognition of the non-linear and diverse transition paths and supporting their own decision-making are important for the well-being of older people with intellectual disabilities in later life.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [24175]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste