The Evolution of Technical Debt from DevOps to Generative AI: A multivocal literature review
Moreschini, Sergio; Arvanitou, Elvira; Kanidou, Elisavet-Persefoni; Nikolaidis, Nikolaos; Su, Ruoyu; Ampatzoglou, Apostolos; Chatzigeorgiou, Alexander; Lenarduzzi, Valentina (2025-01-27)
Moreschini, Sergio
Arvanitou, Elvira
Kanidou, Elisavet-Persefoni
Nikolaidis, Nikolaos
Su, Ruoyu
Ampatzoglou, Apostolos
Chatzigeorgiou, Alexander
Lenarduzzi, Valentina
27.01.2025
Journal of Systems and Software
112599
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202509119162
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202509119162
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background: The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) – including Machine Learning (ML) and Generative AI – into software systems is reshaping the software development lifecycle. As AI-driven systems become more dynamic and complex, traditional approaches to Technical Debt (TD) management face increasing limitations. Simultaneously, AI-assisted development introduces new forms of TD, particularly in relation to maintainability, explainability, and data governance. Objective: This study aims to explore how Technical Debt Management (TDM) must adapt in the context of AI-enhanced software development. It investigates (1) the evolution of TD in AI-driven systems, and (2) the implications of using AI technologies within the software engineering process. Methods: We conducted a multivocal literature review, combining insights from both peer-reviewed research and industry sources. Following established guidelines, we systematically analyzed 61 primary sources, categorized TD types and management activities, and identified key challenges and practices emerging in the AI era. Results: Our findings reveal that data-related, infrastructure, and pipeline-related TD are particularly prevalent in ML systems. Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) practices are increasingly recognized as essential for managing such debt, especially in relation to dynamic data dependencies and model retraining. In parallel, AI-generated artifacts and automated pipelines introduce new governance and maintainability challenges. Conclusion: Technical Debt in AI systems demands continuous, automated, and cross-functional management strategies. As software evolves in response to data and usage, new operational paradigms – grounded in practices like MLOps and Small Language Model Operations (SLMOps) – will be vital to ensure long-term software sustainability. This study provides a foundational map for researchers and practitioners navigating the intersection of AI and TD management.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [22389]
