Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Coexistence Niche of Ultra-Wideband and Wi-Fi: Suspected Spurious Signal Reception in Channel 5

Juran, Radovan; Nurmi, Jari; Ometov, Aleksandr (2025)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Coexistence_Niche_of_UltraWideband_and_WiFi_Suspected_Spurious_Signal_Reception_in_Channel_5.pdf (218.4Kt)
Lataukset: 

URI
https://www.vde-verlag.de/proceedings-en/566544026.html


Juran, Radovan
Nurmi, Jari
Ometov, Aleksandr
2025

This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202509099087

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Introducing Wi-Fi 6E and the emerging Wi-Fi 7 has raised significant questions about the coexistence of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) systems operating in the 6 GHz frequency band. The research in this field has mainly focused on the impact of Wi-Fi on UWB communication and the range of their simultaneous operation. Prior studies have highlighted the destructive effects of Wi-Fi on UWB communication in this band, including the false detection of UWB frames while ongoing UWB transmission. However, to our knowledge, no studies have focused exclusively on the impact of Wi-Fi signals solely on UWB receivers’ behavior in isolation. This paper addresses this gap by presenting results obtained under controlled conditions in an anechoic chamber, where external interference is eliminated. Using a setup with only a DW1000 UWB receiver (DWM1001-DEV) and a Wi-Fi 6E access point (Netgear RAXE500) transmitting standard beacon frames and then traffic emulated by iperf tool it was observed that UWB reception can be influenced even without ongoing active UWB transmissions. On top of that, some of these dropped UWB packets (false negatives) showed signs of good CRC checks (false positives). These findings provide a foundation for further exploration, particularly with both legacy and newer UWB chips to confirm or disprove the implications hereby presented.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [22451]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste