Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A Transfer Strategy Utilizing a Helicopter and a Ground Ambulance Together Does Not Prolong Door-In-Door-Out Times in Thrombectomy Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

Vuorinen, Pauli; Kiili, Joonas; Grönroos, Markku; Virkkunen, Ilkka; Huhtala, Heini; Setälä, Piritta; Hoppu, Sanna (2025-06)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Euro_J_of_Neurology_-_2025_-_Vuorinen_-_A_Transfer_Strategy_Utilizing_a_Helicopter_and_a_Ground_Ambulance_Together_Does_Not.pdf (189.2Kt)
Lataukset: 



Vuorinen, Pauli
Kiili, Joonas
Grönroos, Markku
Virkkunen, Ilkka
Huhtala, Heini
Setälä, Piritta
Hoppu, Sanna
06 / 2025

European Journal of Neurology
e70148
doi:10.1111/ene.70148
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202507257803

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background: An interfacility transfer should commence immediately to a hospital with endovascular capability to perform mechanical thrombectomy when a patient is diagnosed with a large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. The turnaround time in the primary stroke center (PSC) is called door-in-door-out time (DIDO). We investigated DIDOs from two PSCs and how the implementation of a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) unit for patient transportation together with a ground ambulance affected the DIDO. Methods: We retrospectively identified thrombectomy candidates transferred to Tampere University Hospital from two PSCs, Seinäjoki and Kanta-Häme Central Hospitals, from February 2019 until October 2022. A HEMS unit was dispatched to transport the patients from Seinäjoki after June 2020. Patient medical records and DIDOs were also analyzed and compared with ground transport and air transport between the two PSCs. Factors for faster DIDOs were determined by linear regression analysis. Results: The DIDOs of 129 patients were analyzed. The median (interquartile range) DIDO in the total population was 50 (35–71) minutes, and the PSCs achieved equal DIDOs. The strongest factors of the DIDO were the prehospital prenotification (B = −55.6, p < 0.001), the same ambulance continuing the interfacility transport (B = −33.8, p < 0.001), and the patient's age (B = 0.65, p = 0.039). HEMS dispatch or transport was not associated with any delays in DIDO. Conclusion: The prehospital prenotification of a stroke patient to a PSC should include a discussion of whether the patient is a thrombectomy candidate. The same ambulance should be engaged for the mission and continue with the same patient to the thrombectomy facility.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [23833]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste