Effectiveness of the Let’s Move It multi-level vocational school-based intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior: a cluster randomized trial
Hankonen, Nelli; Haukkala, Ari; Palsola, Minttu; Heino, Matti Toivo Juhani; Sund, Reijo; Tokola, Kari; Absetz, Pilvikki; Araújo-Soares, Vera; Sniehotta, Falko F.; Borodulin, Katja; Uutela, Antti; Lintunen, Taru; Vasankari, Tommi (2025)
Hankonen, Nelli
Haukkala, Ari
Palsola, Minttu
Heino, Matti Toivo Juhani
Sund, Reijo
Tokola, Kari
Absetz, Pilvikki
Araújo-Soares, Vera
Sniehotta, Falko F.
Borodulin, Katja
Uutela, Antti
Lintunen, Taru
Vasankari, Tommi
2025
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
kaaf023
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202507237744
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202507237744
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background: Low levels of physical activity (PA), more prevalent among those with low education, require effective interventions. Fewer trials have tested interventions to decrease sedentary behavior (SB). No school-based interventions have shown lasting effects on PA or SB in vocational schools. Purpose: To examine whether the Let’s Move It intervention has effects on behavioral and clinical outcomes among vocational students after 2 and 14 months. Methods: A cluster randomized trial in 6 school units in vocational education in Finland (N = 1112) (mean age 18.5 years, range 15–46). The multi-component intervention targeted in-class activity opportunities (eg, teacher-led activity breaks, equipment in classrooms), and students’ motivation and self-regulation (eg, 6 group sessions, à 45–60 min, during the intensive intervention period of 2 months). Valid (≥ 4 days, ≥ 10 h/ day) accelerometer data were obtained from 741 students at baseline, 521 (70.3%) at 2 months, and 406 (54.8%) at 14 months. Results: No evidence of a significant intervention effect on the co-primary outcomes (moderate-to-vigorous PA, SB, breaks in SB) was found. Participants in the intervention arm reduced their total daily SB time by 32 min (95% CI, −43.2 to −20.8) on weekdays, compared with the control arm’s reduction of 8.6 (95% CI, −19.5 to 2.3) and engaged in more accelerometer-measured light PA during school time. Few differences were found in secondary outcomes. The fidelity of intervention delivery was relatively good. Conclusions: This school-based intervention did not affect leisure-time activity.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [24991]
