Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Extra-alveolar miniscrews: are all brands similar?

Borsato, Karina Tostes; Bernardino, Raissa Mariele; Campos, Lucas Arrais; Bento, Daniela Águida; Vaz, Luiz Geraldo; Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga (2025)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Xo5y4iSG.pdf (7.865Mt)
Lataukset: 



Borsato, Karina Tostes
Bernardino, Raissa Mariele
Campos, Lucas Arrais
Bento, Daniela Águida
Vaz, Luiz Geraldo
Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga
2025

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
e2524221
doi:10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524221.oar
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202505306384

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Introduction: Awide variety of extra-alveolar orthodontic minis-crews are available. Objective: This study aims to describe and compare the design, and the topographical and mechanical properties of five distinct commercial brands of extra-alveolar minis-crews. Methods: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using 25×, 50×, 100×, and 200× photomicrographs, and in-vitro mechanical tests (driving torque, torsion, and pullout test) to compare ex-tra-alveolar miniscrews (n=80, 2 mm x 12 mm) from the following brands: Bioray, DatSteel, Morelli, OBS, and Peclab. Results: De-spite the 2 × 12 mm screw size, only the Morelli and Peclab minis-crews actually measured 12 mm in thread length. The studied brands revealed different thread characteristics (i.e., thread pitch and minor/major diameter). The Morelli miniscrews presented the smallest thread pitch and, consequently, the largest number of threads. Bioray, DatSteel, and OBS miniscrews presented a trapezoidal thread shape, while the others were triangular. SEM showed adequate polishing on the Morelli, OBS, and Peclab miniscrews. The insertion torque was higher than the removal torque for the DatSteel, Morelli, and OBS miniscrews during the driving torque test of the first four threads. The same result occurred with Morelli miniscrews during the driving torque test of the full screw. The resistance limits recorded in the pullout tests were significantly higher than the maximum force used in orthodontic tooth movement. The findings showed no significant differences between the results of the titanium and steel miniscrews. Conclusions: The five types of miniscrews studied presented different characteristics, so the clinician must consider the correct size, number of threads, length, polishing surface, and metallic alloy when choosing the appropriate miniscrew for an application.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20724]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste