Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Condensation/immersion mode ice-nucleating particles in a boreal environment

Paramonov, Mikhail; Paramonov, Mikhail; Van Dusseldorp, Saskia Drossaart; Gute, Ellen; Abbatt, Jonathan P.D.; Heikkilä, Paavo; Keskinen, Jorma; Chen, Xuemeng; Luoma, Krista; Heikkinen, Liine; Hao, Liqing; Petäjä, Tuukka; Kanji, Zamin A. (2020-06-08)

 
Avaa tiedosto
acp_20_6687_2020.pdf (2.119Mt)
Lataukset: 



Paramonov, Mikhail
Paramonov, Mikhail
Van Dusseldorp, Saskia Drossaart
Gute, Ellen
Abbatt, Jonathan P.D.
Heikkilä, Paavo
Keskinen, Jorma
Chen, Xuemeng
Luoma, Krista
Heikkinen, Liine
Hao, Liqing
Petäjä, Tuukka
Kanji, Zamin A.
08.06.2020

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
doi:10.5194/acp-20-6687-2020
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202007086348

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p/><p>Ice-nucleating particle (INP) measurements were performed in the boreal environment of southern Finland at the Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR II) in the winter-spring of 2018. Measurements with the Portable Ice Nucleation Chamber (PINC) were conducted at 242 <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">K</span> and 105 % relative humidity with respect to water. The median INP number concentration [INP] during a 6-week measurement period was 13 <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">L-1</span>. The [INP] spanned 3 orders of magnitude and showed a general increase from mid-February until early April. No single dominant local or regional sources of INPs in the boreal environment of southern Finland could be identified. Rather, it is hypothesised that the INPs detected at SMEAR II are a result of long-range transport and dilution of INPs sourced far from the measurement site. Despite high variability, the measured [INP] values fall within the range expected for the [INP] measured elsewhere under similar thermodynamic conditions. The [INP] did not correlate with any of the examined parameters during the entire field campaign, indicating that no one single parameter can be used to predict the [INP] at the measurement location during the examined time period. The absence of a correlation across the entire field campaign also suggests that a variety of particles act as INPs at different times, although it was indirectly determined that ambient INPs are most likely within the size range of 0.1-0.5 <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">μm</span> in diameter on average. On shorter timescales, several particle species correlated well with the [INP]. Depending on the meteorological conditions, black carbon (BC), supermicron biological particles and sub-0.1 <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">μm</span> particles, most likely nanoscale biological fragments such as ice-nucleating macromolecules (INMs), correlated with the INP signal. However, an increase in the concentration of any of these particle species may not necessarily lead to the increase in the [INP]; the reasons for this remain unknown. Limitations of the instrumental set-up and the necessity for future field INP studies are addressed.</p>.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [22195]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste