Head Motion in Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Quantification, Mitigation, and Structural Associations in Large, Cross-Sectional Datasets Across the Lifespan
-, -; Schilling, Kurt G.; Ramadass, Karthik; Sairanen, Viljami; Kim, Michael E.; Rheault, Francois; Newlin, Nancy; Nguyen, Tin; Barquero, Laura; D'archangel, Micah; Gao, Chenyu; Topolnjak, Ema; Khairi, Nazirah Mohd; Archer, Derek; Beason-Held, Lori L.; Resnick, Susan M.; Hohman, Timothy; Cutting, Laurie; Schneider, Julie; Barnes, Lisa L.; Bennett, David A.; Arfanakis, Konstantinos; Vinci-Booher, Sophia; Albert, Marilyn; Moyer, Daniel; Landman, Bennett A. (2025-02-15)
-, -
Schilling, Kurt G.
Ramadass, Karthik
Sairanen, Viljami
Kim, Michael E.
Rheault, Francois
Newlin, Nancy
Nguyen, Tin
Barquero, Laura
D'archangel, Micah
Gao, Chenyu
Topolnjak, Ema
Khairi, Nazirah Mohd
Archer, Derek
Beason-Held, Lori L.
Resnick, Susan M.
Hohman, Timothy
Cutting, Laurie
Schneider, Julie
Barnes, Lisa L.
Bennett, David A.
Arfanakis, Konstantinos
Vinci-Booher, Sophia
Albert, Marilyn
Moyer, Daniel
Landman, Bennett A.
15.02.2025
Human Brain Mapping
e70143
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202503212925
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202503212925
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Head motion during diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can cause numerous artifacts and biases subsequent quantification. However, a thorough characterization of motion across multiple scans, cohorts, and consortiums has not been performed. To address this, we designed a study with three aims. First, we aimed to characterize subject motion across several large cohorts, utilizing 13 cohorts comprised of 16,995 imaging sessions (age 0.1-100 years, mean age = 63 years; 7220 females; 3175 cognitively impaired adults; 471 developmentally delayed children) to describe the magnitude and directions of subject movement. Second, we aimed to investigate whether state-of-the-art diffusion preprocessing pipelines mitigate biases in quantitative measures of microstructure and connectivity by taking advantage of datasets with scan-rescan acquisitions and ask whether there are detectable differences between the same subjects when scans and rescans have differing levels of motion. Third, we aimed to investigate whether there are structural connectivity differences between movers and non-movers. We found that (1) subjects typically move 1-2 mm/min with most motion as translation in the anterior-posterior direction and rotation around the right-left axis; (2) Modern preprocessing pipelines can effectively mitigate motion to the point where biases are not detectable with current analysis techniques; and (3) There are no apparent differences in microstructure or macrostructural connections in participants who exhibit high motion versus those that exhibit low motion. Overall, characterizing motion magnitude and directions, as well as motion correlates, informs and improves motion mitigation strategies and image processing pipelines.</p>
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20127]