Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Inspiratory Profiles Through Easyhaler Dry Powder Inhaler During Acute Bronchoconstriction

Vartiainen, Ville A.; Tikkakoski, Antti; Malmberg, L. Pekka; Vuotari, Liisa; Lähelmä, Satu; Sairanen, Ulla; Vahteristo, Mikko; Karjalainen, Jussi; Lehtimäki, Lauri (2025)

 
Avaa tiedosto
vartiainen-et-al-2025-inspiratory-profiles-through-easyhaler-dry-powder-inhaler-during-acute-bronchoconstriction.pdf (692.1Kt)
Lataukset: 



Vartiainen, Ville A.
Tikkakoski, Antti
Malmberg, L. Pekka
Vuotari, Liisa
Lähelmä, Satu
Sairanen, Ulla
Vahteristo, Mikko
Karjalainen, Jussi
Lehtimäki, Lauri
2025

JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY
doi:10.1089/jamp.2024.0045
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202503212944

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Background: Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are passive devices, which rely on a patient’s inspiratory effort for drug dispersion and delivery. The aim of this study was to assess how acute bronchoconstriction affects the ability to use Easyhaler DPI in adults. Methods: This study was conducted as part of a parallel-group clinical trial assessing use of Salbutamol Easyhaler, Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler and salbutamol pMDI with spacer during a methacholine challenge (MC) test. The inhalations through both Easyhaler variants, the inhaler for the single active substance product (EH-mono) and the inhaler for the combination product (EH-combi), were recorded at baseline and during bronchoconstriction. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF), flow rate acceleration and inhalation volume after PIF were compared to the criteria for successful inhalation. Results: The study population consisted of 120 adult subjects indicated for MC as a diagnostic test for asthma, with 60 subjects in both Easyhaler arms. With EH-combi 98.3% and 91.4% passed the criteria (PIF ≥30 L/min, inhalation acceleration ≥0.7 L/s<sup>2</sup>, and inhalation volume ≥500 mL after PIF) for successful inhalation at baseline and during bronchoconstriction, respectively. With EH-mono, success rates were 95.0% and 88.1% at baseline and during bronchoconstriction, respectively. The most common reason for not passing the criteria was slow inhalation acceleration. Aside from two subjects using EH-mono during bronchoconstriction, all subjects were able to generate PIF ≥ 30 L/min. Conclusions: During an acute obstructive event, the vast majority of patients have no difficulty in achieving sufficient PIF, inhalation acceleration, and volume after PIF when using an Easyhaler DPI.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20263]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste