Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Factors contributing to readmission in patients with psychotic disorders, with a special reference to first follow-up visit in outpatient care

Suokas, Kimmo; Lindgren, Maija; Gissler, Mika; Liukko, Emmi; Schildt, Laura; Salokangas, Raimo K.R.; Rissanen, Päivi; Gauffin, Tapio; Näätänen, Petri; Holm, Minna; Suvisaari, Jaana (2024-08)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Factors_contributing_to_readmission_in_patients_with_psychotic_disorders_with_a_special_reference_to_first_follow-up_visit_in_outpatient_care.pdf (356.1Kt)
Lataukset: 



Suokas, Kimmo
Lindgren, Maija
Gissler, Mika
Liukko, Emmi
Schildt, Laura
Salokangas, Raimo K.R.
Rissanen, Päivi
Gauffin, Tapio
Näätänen, Petri
Holm, Minna
Suvisaari, Jaana
08 / 2024

Psychological Medicine
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
doi:10.1017/S0033291724001065
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202503172806

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background. Timely outpatient follow-up and readmission after discharge are common quality indicators in psychiatric care, but their association varies in previous research. We aimed to examine whether the impact of outpatient follow-up and other factors on readmission risk evolves over time in people with non-affective psychotic disorder (NAP). Methods. The Finnish Quality of Care Register includes all people diagnosed with NAP since January 2010. Here, we followed patients with a hospital discharge between 2017 and 2021 until readmission, death, or up to 365 days. Time of the first outpatient follow-up appointment, length of stay (LOS), number of previous hospitalizations, psychosis diagnosis, substance use disorder (SUD), residential status, economic activity, gender, age, year, and region were included. Follow-up time was divided into five periods: week 1, weeks 2–4, weeks 5–13, weeks 14–25, and weeks 26–52, and each period was analyzed separately with Cox regression. Results. Of the 29 858 discharged individuals, 54.1% had an outpatient follow-up within a week. A total of 10 623 (35.6%) individuals were readmitted. Short LOS increased the readmission risk in the first four weeks, whereas lack of outpatient follow-up raised the risk (adjusted HRs between 1.15 (95% CI 1.04–1.26) and 1.53 (1.37–1.71) in weeks 5–52. The number of previous hospitalizations remained a consistent risk factor throughout the follow-up, while SUD increased risk after 4 weeks and living without family after 13 weeks. Conclusions. Risk factors of readmission vary over time. These temporal patterns must be considered when developing outpatient treatment programs.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20689]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste