Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of the SOLO1 and PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trials evaluating maintenance olaparib or bevacizumab or the combination of both in newly diagnosed, advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer

Vergote, Ignace; Ray-Coquard, Isabelle; Anderson, Daniel M.; Cantuaria, Guilherme; Colombo, Nicoletta; Garnier-Tixidre, Claire; Gilbert, Lucy; Harter, Philipp; Hettle, Robert; Lorusso, Domenica; Mäenpää, Johanna; Marth, Christian; Matsumoto, Koji; Ouwens, Mario; Poveda, Andrés; Raspagliesi, Francesco; Rhodes, Kirsty; Rubio Pérez, María J.; Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie; Shikama, Ayumi; Sikorska, Magdalena; Moore, Kathleen; DiSilvestro, Paul (2021)

 
Avaa tiedosto
1_s2.0_S0959804921005505_main.pdf (670.8Kt)
Lataukset: 



Vergote, Ignace
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Anderson, Daniel M.
Cantuaria, Guilherme
Colombo, Nicoletta
Garnier-Tixidre, Claire
Gilbert, Lucy
Harter, Philipp
Hettle, Robert
Lorusso, Domenica
Mäenpää, Johanna
Marth, Christian
Matsumoto, Koji
Ouwens, Mario
Poveda, Andrés
Raspagliesi, Francesco
Rhodes, Kirsty
Rubio Pérez, María J.
Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie
Shikama, Ayumi
Sikorska, Magdalena
Moore, Kathleen
DiSilvestro, Paul
2021

European Journal of Cancer
doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.023
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202110117498

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Background: In the absence of randomised head-to-head trials, we conducted a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (PA-ITC) of phase III trial data to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab alone and in combination in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation (BRCAm). Methods: An unanchored PA-ITC was performed on investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) data. Individual patient data from SOLO1 (olaparib versus placebo) and from BRCA-mutated patients in PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab) were pooled. Each arm of PAOLA-1 was weighted so that key baseline patient characteristics were similar to the SOLO1 cohort. Analyses were performed in patients with complete baseline data. Weighted Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of different maintenance therapy strategies, supplemented by weighted Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results: Data from SOLO1 patients (olaparib, n = 254; placebo, n = 126) were compared with data from BRCA-mutated PAOLA-1 patients (olaparib plus bevacizumab, n = 151; placebo plus bevacizumab, n = 71). Adding bevacizumab to olaparib was associated with a numerical improvement in PFS compared with olaparib alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–1.09). Statistically significant improvements in PFS were seen with olaparib alone versus placebo plus bevacizumab (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.30–0.75), olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo (0.23; 0.14–0.34), and placebo plus bevacizumab versus placebo (0.65; 0.43–0.95). Conclusions: Results of this hypothesis-generating PA-ITC analysis support the use of maintenance olaparib alone or with bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCAm.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20153]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste