Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Tissue Identification from Surgical Smoke by Differential Mobility Spectrometry: an in vivo study

Kontunen, Anton; Karhunen-Enckell, Ulla; Karjalainen, Markus; Anttalainen, Anna; Kumpulainen, Pekka; Pitkänen, Leena; Anttalainen, Osmo; Vehkaoja, Antti; Oksala, Niku; Roine, Antti (2021)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Tissue_Identification_From_Surgical_Smoke_by_Differential_Mobility_Spectrometry_An_in_Vivo_Study.pdf (2.512Mt)
Lataukset: 



Kontunen, Anton
Karhunen-Enckell, Ulla
Karjalainen, Markus
Anttalainen, Anna
Kumpulainen, Pekka
Pitkänen, Leena
Anttalainen, Osmo
Vehkaoja, Antti
Oksala, Niku
Roine, Antti
2021

IEEE Access
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3136719
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202201141313

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>The increasing number of breast cancer survivors and their longevity has emphasized the importance of esthetic and functional outcomes of cancer surgery and increased pressure for the surgical treatment to achieve negative margins with minimal removal of healthy tissue. Surgical smoke has been successfully utilized in tissue identification in laboratory conditions by using a system based on differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) that could provide a seamless margin assessment method. In this study, a DMS-based tissue analysis system was used intraoperatively in 20 breast cancer surgeries to assess its feasibility in tissue identification. The effect of the system on complications and duration of surgeries was also studied. The surgeries were recorded with a head-worn camera system for visual annotation of the operated tissue types to enable classification of the measurement files by supervised learning. There were statistically significant differences among the DMS spectra of the tissue types. The classification of four tissue types (skin, fat, glandular tissue, and connective tissue) yielded a cross-validated accuracy of 44% and exhibited high variation between surgeries. The low accuracies can be attributed to the limitations and uncertainty of the visual annotation, high-within class variance due to the heterogeneity of tissues as well as environmental conditions, and delays of the real-time analysis of the smoke samples. Differences between tissues encountered in breast surgery were identified and the technology can be implemented in surgery workflow. However, in its current state, the DMS-based system is not yet applicable to a clinical setting to aid in margin assessment.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [25017]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste