Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Reliability and validity of the ONAPS physical activity questionnaire in assessing physical activity and sedentary behavior in French adults

Charles, Marc; Thivel, David; Verney, Julien; Isacco, Laurie; Husu, Pauliina; Vähä-Ypyä, Henri; Vasankari, Tommi; Tardieu, Michèle; Fillon, Alicia; Genin, Pauline; Larras, Benjamin; Chabanas, Bruno; Pereira, Bruno; Duclos, Martine (2021-06-01)

 
Avaa tiedosto
reliability_and_validity_2021.pdf (603.7Kt)
Lataukset: 



Charles, Marc
Thivel, David
Verney, Julien
Isacco, Laurie
Husu, Pauliina
Vähä-Ypyä, Henri
Vasankari, Tommi
Tardieu, Michèle
Fillon, Alicia
Genin, Pauline
Larras, Benjamin
Chabanas, Bruno
Pereira, Bruno
Duclos, Martine
01.06.2021

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
5643
doi:10.3390/ijerph18115643
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202106075704

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>This study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of a new questionnaire, the ONAPS-PAQ, developed to assess physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors (SB) in the general population. A total of 137 healthy adults aged 18 to 69 years were included. Following completion of two physical activity questionnaires (ONAPS-PAQ and GPAQ, the Global physical activity question-naire) to study concurrent validity, participants wore an accelerometer (UKK-RM42) for 7 days to study criterion validity. A subsample (n = 36) also completed a 7-day-interval test–retest protocol to assess its reliability. Reliability was tested by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa coefficient; concurrent and criterion validity by the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) and Bland-Altman plot analyses. The ONAPS-PAQ showed good reliability (ICC = 0.71–0.98; Kappa = 0.61–0.99) and concurrent validity (ρ = 0.56–0.86), but only poor criterion validity (ρ = 0.26–0.41), and wide limits of agreement. Self-reported and accelerometer-measured SB were better correlated with ONAPS-PAQ than GPAQ (0.41 vs. 0.26, respectively) and medians were comparable, whereas the GPAQ underestimated SB (SB<sub>acc</sub> = 481 (432–566), SB<sub>ONAPS</sub> = 480 (360–652), SB<sub>GPAQ</sub> = 360 (240–540) min·day<sup>−1</sup>; median (q1-q3)). The ONAPS-PAQ provides good reliability and acceptable validity for the measurement of PA and SB and seems to provide a better assessment of SB than GPAQ.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20275]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste