Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessment of Crop Yield Prediction Capabilities of CNN Using Multisource Data

Nevavuori, Petteri; Narra, Nathaniel; Linna, Petri; Lipping, Tarmo (2021-05-19)

 
Avaa tiedosto
assessment_of_crop_yield.pdf (691.1Kt)
Lataukset: 



Nevavuori, Petteri
Narra, Nathaniel
Linna, Petri
Lipping, Tarmo
19.05.2021

This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77860-6_10
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202205034256

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
The growing abundance of digitally available spatial, geological, and climatological data opens up new opportunities for agricultural data-based input–output modeling. In our study, we took a convolutional neural network model previously developed on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) image data only and set out to see whether additional inputs from multiple sources would improve the performance of the model. Using the model developed in a preceding study, we fed field-specific data from the following sources: near-infrared data from UAV overflights, Sentinel-2 multispectral data, weather data from locally installed Vantage Pro weather stations, topographical maps from National Land Survey of Finland, soil samplings, and soil conductivity data gathered with a Veris MSP3 soil conductivity probe. Either directly added or encoded as additional layers to the input data, we concluded that additional data helps the spatial point-in-time model learn better features, producing better fit models in the task of yield prediction. With data of four fields, the most significant performance improvements came from using all input data sources. We point out, however, that combining data of various spatial or temporal resolution (i.e., weather data, soil data, and weekly acquired images, for example) might cause data leakage between the training and testing data sets when training the CNNs and, therefore, the improvement rate of adding additional data layers should be interpreted with caution.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [23753]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste