Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-based and Jiles-Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis
Upadhaya, Brijesh; Rasilo, Paavo; Perkkiö, Lauri; Handgruber, Paul; Belahcen, Anouar; Arkkio, Antero (2020)
Upadhaya, Brijesh
Rasilo, Paavo
Perkkiö, Lauri
Handgruber, Paul
Belahcen, Anouar
Arkkio, Antero
2020
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202004233552
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202004233552
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
In this paper, we apply an anisotropic extension for the energy-based and the Jiles-Atherton hysteresis models to simulate both unidirectional alternating and rotational magnetic field excitations. The results show a good agreement with measurements for unidirectional alternating fields. However, the results for rotational fields, especially at high magnitudes, show a significant discrepancy with the measurement data. We demonstrate that the Jiles-Atherton model with appropriate parameters can estimate the losses in alternating cases up to 1.5 T, whereas both models give reasonable loss estimation up to 1 T in rotational cases.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [19351]