Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer in Biopsies—Current Status and Next Steps

Kartasalo, Kimmo; Bulten, Wouter; Delahunt, Brett; Chen, Po Hsuan Cameron; Pinckaers, Hans; Olsson, Henrik; Ji, Xiaoyi; Mulliqi, Nita; Samaratunga, Hemamali; Tsuzuki, Toyonori; Lindberg, Johan; Rantalainen, Mattias; Wählby, Carolina; Litjens, Geert; Ruusuvuori, Pekka; Egevad, Lars; Eklund, Martin (2021)

 
Avaa tiedosto
1_s2.0_S2405456921001814_main.pdf (582.4Kt)
Lataukset: 



Kartasalo, Kimmo
Bulten, Wouter
Delahunt, Brett
Chen, Po Hsuan Cameron
Pinckaers, Hans
Olsson, Henrik
Ji, Xiaoyi
Mulliqi, Nita
Samaratunga, Hemamali
Tsuzuki, Toyonori
Lindberg, Johan
Rantalainen, Mattias
Wählby, Carolina
Litjens, Geert
Ruusuvuori, Pekka
Egevad, Lars
Eklund, Martin
2021

European Urology Focus
doi:10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.002
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202109026921

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer in biopsies are critical for the clinical management of men with prostate cancer. Despite this, the high grading variability among pathologists leads to the potential for under- and overtreatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have shown promise in assisting pathologists to perform Gleason grading, which could help address this problem. In this mini-review, we highlight studies reporting on the development of AI systems for cancer detection and Gleason grading, and discuss the progress needed for widespread clinical implementation, as well as anticipated future developments. Patient summary: This mini-review summarizes the evidence relating to the validation of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted cancer detection and Gleason grading of prostate cancer in biopsies, and highlights the remaining steps required prior to its widespread clinical implementation. We found that, although there is strong evidence to show that AI is able to perform Gleason grading on par with experienced uropathologists, more work is needed to ensure the accuracy of results from AI systems in diverse settings across different patient populations, digitization platforms, and pathology laboratories.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [24196]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste