Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Are architectural smells independent from code smells? An empirical study

Arcelli Fontana, Francesca; Lenarduzzi, Valentina; Roveda, Riccardo; Taibi, Davide (2019-08-01)

 
Avaa tiedosto
2018_JSS_Architectural_Smells_vs_Code_Smells_18.pdf (482.2Kt)
Lataukset: 



Arcelli Fontana, Francesca
Lenarduzzi, Valentina
Roveda, Riccardo
Taibi, Davide
01.08.2019

Journal of Systems and Software
doi:10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.066
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202101151327

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Background. Architectural smells and code smells are symptoms of bad code or design that can cause different quality problems, such as faults, technical debt, or difficulties with maintenance and evolution. Some studies show that code smells and architectural smells often appear together in the same file. The correlation between code smells and architectural smells, however, is not clear yet; some studies on a limited set of projects have claimed that architectural smells can be derived from code smells, while other studies claim the opposite. Objective. The goal of this work is to understand whether architectural smells are independent from code smells or can be derived from a code smell or from one category of them. Method. We conducted a case study analyzing the correlations among 19 code smells, six categories of code smells, and four architectural smells. Results. The results show that architectural smells are correlated with code smells only in a very low number of occurrences and therefore cannot be derived from code smells. Conclusion. Architectural smells are independent from code smells, and therefore deserve special attention by researchers, who should investigate their actual harmfulness, and practitioners, who should consider whether and when to remove them.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [22385]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste