Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Electrode comparison for textile-integrated electrocardiogram and impedance pneumography measurement

Tuohimäki, Katariina; Mahdiani, S.; Jeyhani, V.; Vehkaoja, A.; Iso-Ketola, P.; Vanhala, J.; Viik, J.; Mäntysalo, M. (2017)

 
Avaa tiedosto
229.pdf (117.2Kt)
Lataukset: 



Tuohimäki, Katariina
Mahdiani, S.
Jeyhani, V.
Vehkaoja, A.
Iso-Ketola, P.
Vanhala, J.
Viik, J.
Mäntysalo, M.
2017

This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_76
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tty-201708141672

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Wearable electronics is a quickly broadening category in sports, wellbeing and entertainment products. Also, fully textile-integrated electronics is used increasingly to improve user experience. Medical industry is interested in exploiting, especially the latter sub-category of wearable electronics in long-term home care. In this study, we report a textile-integrated electrocardiography (ECG) and impedance pneumography (IP) measurement system. The performance of the system is evaluated by comparing the measurement accuracy for heart rate and respiration rate obtained with different electrode types and different measurement methods. Three electrode types: disposable, textile, and printed electrodes, are investigated and both, bipolar and tetrapolar measurement methods are compared by using a modified commercial evaluation board. Disposable electrodes provide the least noisy signal and the most stable results. However, the skin irritation caused by these electrodes prevents their use in long-term monitoring. The textile and printed electrodes did not seem to cause similar skin irritation. From the two measuring techniques, tetrapolar measuring method had higher noise levels, but heart rate and breathing were estimated with better accuracy compared to bipolar measuring method.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [25226]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste