Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Unambiguous Techniques Modernized GNSS Signals: Surveying the solutions

Lohan, Elena-Simona; Alonso de Diego, Diego; Lopez Salcedo, Jose; Seco-Granados, Gonzalo; Boto, Pedro; Fernandes, Pedro (2017)

 
Avaa tiedosto
SurveyTuto_CameraReady.pdf (1.130Mt)
Lataukset: 



Lohan, Elena-Simona
Alonso de Diego, Diego
Lopez Salcedo, Jose
Seco-Granados, Gonzalo
Boto, Pedro
Fernandes, Pedro
2017

IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
doi:10.1109/MSP.2017.2711778
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tty-201710031978

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) remain, by far, the most reliable and widely spread sources of accurate outdoor positioning. With the advent of the new and modernized signals, novel challenges related to GNSS receivers have also been recognized. One of the most important challenges in dealing with modernized GNSS signals is posed by the oscillatory behavior of the autocorrelation of some of those signals, which causes ambiguities in the measurement of the propagation delay. This article is an extensive survey of the solutions in this area proposed during past decades. Not only does it illustrate that a large pool of solutions is available, but it also shows that none of these solutions alone can currently overcome all of the challenges related to GNSS ambiguities. A thorough overview of the problems caused by the ambiguities in the delay estimation and the unambiguous techniques proposed to counteract them is presented. We hope to spark the interest of the signal processing community and to stimulate new advances in this field. Unambiguous methods are classified into three main classes, and we compare the main solutions in terms of complexity and performance to identify the most promising techniques and directions to be followed. We point out that there is an inherent tradeoff between the unambiguous acquisition and unambiguous tracking, and that the receiver stages of acquisition and tracking can be designed in a disjoint manner when dealing with the ambiguities.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [23896]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste