Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Impact of mesorectal extranodal tumor deposits in magnetic resonance imaging on outcome of rectal cancer patients

Marjasuo, Suvi T.; Lehtimäki, Tiina E.; Koskenvuo, Laura E.; Lepistö, Anna H. (2024-06)

 
Avaa tiedosto
1-s2.0-S0748798324003895-main.pdf (1.610Mt)
Lataukset: 



Marjasuo, Suvi T.
Lehtimäki, Tiina E.
Koskenvuo, Laura E.
Lepistö, Anna H.
06 / 2024

European Journal of Surgical Oncology
108337
doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108337
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202407167645

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Aim: Mesorectal extranodal tumor deposits (TDs) are identified in many rectal cancers. Their radiological features differ from metastatic lymph nodes, and they can be detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectal cancer TDs detected with MRI and their impact on overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) and the local recurrence rate. Method: In this retrospective cohort study, we screened all 525 consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery during 2017–2018 in a tertiary center. Patients with synchronous metastases or who had not undergone MRI were excluded. We analyzed the OS, CSS, and DFS as well as local recurrences. Results: Of the 480 included patients, TDs were detected in the images of 81 (16.9 %). Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) and TDs were frequently found together (n = 50, 61.7 % of all cases with TDs). The presence of TDs alone [hazard ratio (HR) 1.66 (1.03–2.68)] or TDs and/or EMVI [HR 1.63 (1.01–2.62)] were risk factors for adverse DFS in multivariate Cox regression analysis. The OS and CSS rates were poorer among patients with TDs compared to those without, p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively. TDs were also a risk factor for local recurrence in the univariate analysis. Conclusions: TDs detected with imaging are a risk factor for impaired DFS and associated with impaired CSS and OS of rectal cancer patients and should be taken into consideration in clinical decision-making.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20234]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste