Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Psychological well-being of children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease

Vekara, Laura; Kantanen, Saija; Kolho, Kaija-Leena; Räsänen, Kati; Lakka, Timo; Huhtala, Heini; Piippo-Savolainen, Eija; Arikoski, Pekka; Hiltunen, Pauliina (2024-06)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Psychological_well_being_of_children_and_adolescents_with_inflammatory.pdf (1.120Mt)
Lataukset: 



Vekara, Laura
Kantanen, Saija
Kolho, Kaija-Leena
Räsänen, Kati
Lakka, Timo
Huhtala, Heini
Piippo-Savolainen, Eija
Arikoski, Pekka
Hiltunen, Pauliina
06 / 2024

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
doi:10.1002/jpn3.12220
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202405306505

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Objectives: Prior studies on the psychological well-being in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) have reported controversial results. Our aim was to compare the psychological well-being and lifestyle factors in patients with PIBD and their controls and to assess the role of contributing disease characteristics. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 60 PIBD patients aged 6−17 years (26 with Crohn's disease [CD], 34 with ulcerative colitis [CD] or unclassified colitis [IBD-U]) from two university hospitals in Finland, and their age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Psychological well-being was assessed with three measures: a questionnaire on overall psychological well-being (PSWB) and for adolescents also Beck Depression Inventory (BDI Ia) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). In addition to disease characteristics and pain, we assessed physical activity, sleep, screen time, and social well-being. Results: Controls were more likely of stressing more (OR = 3.67, 95% CI = 1.02−13.14), but other measures of psychological well-being did not differ statistically significantly between patients and controls. In CD, a clinically more active disease associated with inferior psychological well-being in adolescents (BDI [ρ = 0.63, p = 0.021], PSS [ρ = 0.70, p = 0.008], PSWB [ρ = 0.56, p = 0.049]). Longer time from diagnosis correlated with better psychological well-being on BDI (ρ = −0.39, p = 0.024) and PSS (ρ = −0.38, p = 0.034). Lifestyle was more sedentary in PIBD (less physical activity in children OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68−0.99 and more screen time in adolescents OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.00−1.40). Conclusion: Although the clinical features of PIBD are potentially a burden for psychological well-being, many young patients cope well with their disease. Individual variation in well-being is remarkable, making supportive measures challenging.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [24210]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste