Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Correlation between the accuracy of the emergency response centre’s urgency assessment and emergency medical services non-conveyance: a retrospective register-based study in Finland

Salminen, Tomi; Kaartinen, Kaius; Palonen, Mira; Setälä, Piritta; Paavilainen, Eija; Hoppu, Sanna (2024)

 
Avaa tiedosto
s12873-024-01108-5.pdf (1.164Mt)
Lataukset: 



Salminen, Tomi
Kaartinen, Kaius
Palonen, Mira
Setälä, Piritta
Paavilainen, Eija
Hoppu, Sanna
2024

Bmc Emergency Medicine
193
doi:10.1186/s12873-024-01108-5
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202411019770

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background: In modern emergency medical services (EMS), ambulances increasingly focus on examining and treating the patient at the scene. This has led to increased levels of non-conveyance. In Finland, for instance, approximately 40% of EMS dispatches end up in non-conveyance. As EMS systems evolve, the proportion of non-conveyance could serve as a cost-effective measure to assess the quality of the dispatch criteria, if a link to the performance of urgency assessment would be established. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the proportion of non-conveyance is associated with the test performance levels of the urgency assessment. This investigation was done separately within each dispatch category. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of the data was conducted on all EMS dispatches in the Pirkanmaa Hospital District from 1 August 2021 through 31 August 2021. There were a total of 7,245 EMS dispatches during the study period of which 829 were excluded. This study was conducted by comparing the existing test performance levels (sensitivity, specificity and under- or overestimation) of the emergency response centre’s urgency assessment with the non-conveyance rate (%) of each dispatch category. The relationships between the variables were measured using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results: The proportion of over-triage was the only urgency assessment’s test performance variable that had a statistically significant correlation with the proportion of non-conveyance (r = 0.568; p = 0.003). Other test performance variables of the urgency assessment had no or little correlation to the proportion of non-conveyance. Of the 6,416 EMS dispatches in the study period, 42% (2,672) resulted in non-conveyance of the patient. In nine dispatch categories, at least half (51–69%) of the dispatches ended in non-conveyance. Conclusions: Based on this study, it seems that the percentage of non-conveyance in the dispatch category could be used, with certain limitations, to assess the proportion of over-triage in the dispatch category. The method is particularly applicable in scenarios where the dispatch criteria have undergone modifications and there is a need to monitor the effect of the changes on the level of over-triage.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [23485]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste