Computational prediction of impact sound insulation of a full-scale timber floor applying a FEM simulation procedure
Lietzén, Jesse; Kovalainen, Ville; Kylliäinen, Mikko; Pajunen, Sami (2024-07-01)
Lietzén, Jesse
Kovalainen, Ville
Kylliäinen, Mikko
Pajunen, Sami
01.07.2024
Engineering Structures
118130
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202406107090
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202406107090
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>During the recent decades, simulation procedures involving the finite element method (FEM) have been developed to enable prediction of impact sound insulation of timber slabs and floors. FEM simulations have previously been applied for timber floors mainly in low frequencies despite their evident ability to operate over a wide frequency range. Additionally, the validation processes have involved calibrations and experimental modal analyses which can seldom be performed in product development tasks concerning full structures. The purpose of this research was to study the applicability of a FEM simulation procedure to predict normalised impact sound pressure levels L<sub>n</sub> of a full-scale timber floor if material data provided by the product manufacturers is used. The floor was studied at three construction stages where the FEM simulations were performed for the bare floor and the rib slab, and the floor covering was considered in the post-processing stage in case of the full floor. The impact force excitation generated by the ISO standard tapping machine was described with the recently published procedure involving explicit dynamics analysis. To serve the purposes of this study, the FEM models were fully constructed before the measurements were carried out. According to the results, the 1/3-octave L<sub>n</sub> of the full floor and the floor without covering was predicted with a 0 to 9 dB accuracy depending on the frequency band and the single-number quantities with a 0 to 4 dB accuracy. The single-number quantities of the bare rib slab were underestimated with the simulations by 4 to 5 dB. Probable causes for the discrepancies between the simulation and measurement results pointed mainly to the uncertain material properties but possibilities for modelling inaccuracies could not be excluded.</p>
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20161]