Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Black carbon instrument responses to laboratory generated particles

Salo, Laura; Saarnio, Karri; Saarikoski, Sanna; Teinilä, Kimmo; Barreira, Luis M.F.; Marjanen, Petteri; Martikainen, Sampsa; Keskinen, Helmi; Mustonen, Katja; Lepistö, Teemu; Aakko-Saksa, Päivi; Hakkarainen, Henri; Pfeiffer, Tobias; Jalava, Pasi; Karjalainen, Panu; Keskinen, Jorma; Kuittinen, Niina; Timonen, Hilkka; Rönkkö, Topi (2024-05-17)

 
Avaa tiedosto
1-s2.0-S1309104224000539-main.pdf (2.548Mt)
Lataukset: 



Salo, Laura
Saarnio, Karri
Saarikoski, Sanna
Teinilä, Kimmo
Barreira, Luis M.F.
Marjanen, Petteri
Martikainen, Sampsa
Keskinen, Helmi
Mustonen, Katja
Lepistö, Teemu
Aakko-Saksa, Päivi
Hakkarainen, Henri
Pfeiffer, Tobias
Jalava, Pasi
Karjalainen, Panu
Keskinen, Jorma
Kuittinen, Niina
Timonen, Hilkka
Rönkkö, Topi
17.05.2024

Atmospheric Pollution Research
102088
doi:10.1016/j.apr.2024.102088
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202403142884

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Accurate measurement of black carbon (BC) particles is vital for climate models as well as air quality assessments. While the need for BC particle measurement has been recognized, standardization of instruments and procedures for ambient measurement is still underway. In this study, we used laboratory generated soot particles to assess nine instruments targeting BC mass concentration measurement. The measurement matrix included different BC concentrations (ranging from atmospheric levels to combustion emission levels), different particle coatings, two particle sources (gas burner and spark generator) and two dilution methods. The nine instruments included six different models: aethalometers AE33 and MA200, thermo-optical OC-EC analysis, multi-angle absorption photometer MAAP 5012, photoacoustic instrument MSS, and soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer SP-AMS. The main discrepancy we observed was that the SP-AMS results were systematically lower, approximately only half of the BC measured by other instruments. A portion of this is explained by particle losses in the aerodynamic lens of the SP-AMS and the parameters used in the data analysis. Some smaller discrepancies were identified for the other instruments, but overall, the median values from were within 25 % of each other. Instruments’ operation principles and covered concentration ranges need to be carefully considered especially in emission measurements where the aerosols can have high temporal variation as well as high BC concentrations. In general, the results can decrease the uncertainties in climate and air quality studies by providing tools for more accurate and comparable BC measurements and when the existing BC data is interpreted.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [23485]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste