Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Fear of childbirth prolongs interpregnancy interval: A nationwide register-based quantile logistic regression analysis

Vaajala, Matias; Mattila, Ville M.; Kuitunen, Ilari (2024-03)

 
Avaa tiedosto
1-s2.0-S2590161324000012-main.pdf (822.5Kt)
Lataukset: 



Vaajala, Matias
Mattila, Ville M.
Kuitunen, Ilari
03 / 2024

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X
100281
doi:10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100281
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202405145865

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Introduction: It is not well studied how fear of childbirth (FOC) influences the interpregnancy interval (IPI). Thus, we aimed to analyze the association between FOC and the length of the IPI. Methods: All women having their first and second pregnancies during the study period (2004–2018) were gathered from the Finnish Medical Birth Register. A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between the FOC and subsequent length of the IPI. The length of the IPI was assessed separately for women with FOC in the first pregnancy, and for women who developed the FOC in the second pregnancy. IPIs with a length in the lower quartal were considered short IPIs, and length in the upper quartal as long IPIs. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% CIs were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 52 709 women with short IPI (<1.05 years), 105 604 women with normal IPI, and 52 889 women with long IPI (>2.57 years) were included. A total of 3606 women had FOC in the first pregnancy, and a total of 11 473 had their first FOC diagnosis in the second pregnancy. Women with FOC in the first pregnancy had lower odds for short IPI (aOR 0.88, CI 0.81–0.95) and higher odds for long IPI (aOR 1.30, CI 1.21–1.40). Women with the first FOC diagnosis in the second pregnancy had higher odds for long IPI (aOR 1.68, CI 1.61–1.75), When only vaginal deliveries in the first pregnancy were included, women with FOC in the second pregnancy had lower odds for long IPI (aOR 0.71, CI 0.66–0.75) and higher odds for long IPI (aOR 1.52, CI 1.41–1.62), when only cesarean section was included. Conclusion: The main finding of this study was that women with FOC had notably higher odds for long IPI. The etiologic and background factors behind FOC should be better recognized and prevented, and FOC should not only be considered as a complicating factor for pregnancy and delivery but also a factor that strongly affects the desire of women to get pregnant again.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20263]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste