Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Patient perceptions of the Finnish guidelines enabling coeliac disease diagnosis without biopsies in adults

Sareila, Hanna; Kurppa, Kalle; Huhtala, Heini; Laurikka, Pilvi; Arnala, Sanna; Koskela, Tuomas; Kaukinen, Katri; Kivelä, Laura (2024-12-02)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Patient_perceptions_of_the_Finnish_guidelines_enabling_coeliac_disease_diagnosis_without_biopsies_in_adults.pdf (1.223Mt)
Lataukset: 



Sareila, Hanna
Kurppa, Kalle
Huhtala, Heini
Laurikka, Pilvi
Arnala, Sanna
Koskela, Tuomas
Kaukinen, Katri
Kivelä, Laura
02.12.2024

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
doi:10.1080/00365521.2024.2431628
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-2024121911449

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Objectives: Diagnosis of coeliac disease based on serology only has been allowed since 2018 in Finland for adults meeting specific criteria. We studied the patient experiences and perceptions of this novel diagnostic option. Methods: Altogether 194 adult patients were questioned on socio‐demographic and health-related characteristics, quality of life and various coeliac disease-related issues. The results were compared between patients diagnosed with intestinal biopsy or based on serology only. Results: Altogether 69 (36%) of the patients were diagnosed without duodenal biopsies. They were younger (median 43 vs. 51 years, p = 0.046), diagnosed more recently (2021 vs. 2020, p < 0.001) and more often in primary health care (78% vs. 43%, p = 0.001), had fewer esophageal symptoms at diagnosis (17% vs. 30%, p = 0.046) and considered the diagnostic process easier (49% vs. 30%, p = 0.032) than those diagnosed by duodenal biopsy (n = 125). The no-biopsy group received less often dietician follow-up (4% vs. 17%, p = 0.012), reported more persistent symptoms (36% vs. 21%, p = 0.026) and experienced more stress due to the diet (68% vs. 47%, p = 0.039). Symptom persistence or stress were not associated with year of diagnosis or dietician follow-up. The groups were comparable in socio-economic characteristics, general health, quality of life, diagnostic delay, dietician guidance at diagnosis, and dietary adherence. Conclusions: The non-invasive approach resulted in de-centralized diagnosis and easier patient-experienced diagnostic process of coeliac disease, but was associated with increased risk for persistent symptoms and stress due to gluten-free diet. These results highlight the significance of appropriate patient guidance and support regardless of the diagnostic strategy.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20161]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste