Assessment of blood cultures and antibiotic susceptibility testing for bacterial sepsis diagnosis and utilization of results by clinicians in Benin: A qualitative study
Mero, Sointu; Elovainio, Riku; Haukka, Kaisa (2023-01-16)
Mero, Sointu
Elovainio, Riku
Haukka, Kaisa
16.01.2023
Frontiers in Public Health
1088590
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202303223069
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202303223069
Kuvaus
Non peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Objectives: We assessed the current status of blood culture and antibiotic
susceptibility testing (AST) practices in clinical laboratories in Benin, and how the
laboratory results are used by physicians to prescribe antibiotics.
Methods: The qualitative study covered twenty-five clinical laboratories with a
bacteriology unit and associated hospitals and pharmacies. Altogether 159 laboratory staff , physicians and pharmacists were interviewed about their perceptions of the state of laboratory diagnostics related to sepsis and the use of antibiotics. Face-to-face interviews based on structured questionnaires were supported by direct observations when visiting five laboratories in across the country.
Results: Only 6 laboratories (24%) conducted blood cultures, half of them
with a maximum of 10 samples per month. The most common gram-negative
bacteria isolated from blood cultures were: Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi while the most common gram-positives were
Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus aureus. None of the laboratories listed
Klebsiella pneumoniae among the three most common bacteria isolated from blood cultures, although other evidence indicates that it is the most common cause of sepsis in Benin. Due to limited testing capacity, physicians most commonly use empirical antibiotic therapy.
Conclusions: More resources are needed to develop laboratory testing capacity,
technical skills in bacterial identification, AST, quality assurance, and communication of results must be strengthened.
susceptibility testing (AST) practices in clinical laboratories in Benin, and how the
laboratory results are used by physicians to prescribe antibiotics.
Methods: The qualitative study covered twenty-five clinical laboratories with a
bacteriology unit and associated hospitals and pharmacies. Altogether 159 laboratory staff , physicians and pharmacists were interviewed about their perceptions of the state of laboratory diagnostics related to sepsis and the use of antibiotics. Face-to-face interviews based on structured questionnaires were supported by direct observations when visiting five laboratories in across the country.
Results: Only 6 laboratories (24%) conducted blood cultures, half of them
with a maximum of 10 samples per month. The most common gram-negative
bacteria isolated from blood cultures were: Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi while the most common gram-positives were
Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus aureus. None of the laboratories listed
Klebsiella pneumoniae among the three most common bacteria isolated from blood cultures, although other evidence indicates that it is the most common cause of sepsis in Benin. Due to limited testing capacity, physicians most commonly use empirical antibiotic therapy.
Conclusions: More resources are needed to develop laboratory testing capacity,
technical skills in bacterial identification, AST, quality assurance, and communication of results must be strengthened.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [19282]