Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Engineering students’ approaches to learning in two student-centred instructional models before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Rämö, Johanna; Nokelainen, Petri; Kangaslampi, Riikka; Viro, Elina; Kaarakka, Terhi; Nieminen, Maiju; Hirvonen, Jani; Ali-Löytty, Simo (2023-11)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Engineering_students_approaches_to_learning_in_two_student_centred_instructional_models_before_and_during_the_COVID_19_pandemic.pdf (1.455Mt)
Lataukset: 



Rämö, Johanna
Nokelainen, Petri
Kangaslampi, Riikka
Viro, Elina
Kaarakka, Terhi
Nieminen, Maiju
Hirvonen, Jani
Ali-Löytty, Simo
11 / 2023

European Journal of Engineering Education
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
doi:10.1080/03043797.2023.2206794
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202306076580

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
In this study, we investigated how well two different student-centred instructional models fostered engineering students’ learning in a time of crisis. We analysed students’ (N = 375) approaches to learning during four engineering mathematics courses in a Finnish university before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Students’ deep and surface approaches to learning, as well as organised studying, were measured five times during an eight-month period. For the control group the student-centred elements were added to the framework of traditional lecture-based teaching, whereas the intervention group’s instructional model disrupted the structures of traditional teaching more profoundly. Our results indicate that the pandemic and related restrictions were linked to a decrease in students’ deep approach to learning and organised studying, and an increase of surface approach to learning in both groups. However, the intervention group’s instructional model supported the deep approach to learning better than that of the control group.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [23722]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste