Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Interobserver reproducibility of cribriform cancer in prostate needle biopsies and validation of International Society of Urological Pathology criteria

Egevad, Lars; Delahunt, Brett; Iczkowski, Kenneth A.; van der Kwast, Theo; van Leenders, Geert J.L.H.; Leite, Katia R.M.; Pan, Chin Chen; Samaratunga, Hemamali; Tsuzuki, Toyonori; Mulliqi, Nita; Ji, Xiaoyi; Olsson, Henrik; Valkonen, Masi; Ruusuvuori, Pekka; Eklund, Martin; Kartasalo, Kimmo (2023-01)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Histopathology_2023_Egevad_Interobserver_reproducibility_of_cribriform_cancer_in_prostate_needle_biopsies_and_1.pdf (2.197Mt)
Lataukset: 



Egevad, Lars
Delahunt, Brett
Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
van der Kwast, Theo
van Leenders, Geert J.L.H.
Leite, Katia R.M.
Pan, Chin Chen
Samaratunga, Hemamali
Tsuzuki, Toyonori
Mulliqi, Nita
Ji, Xiaoyi
Olsson, Henrik
Valkonen, Masi
Ruusuvuori, Pekka
Eklund, Martin
Kartasalo, Kimmo
01 / 2023

HISTOPATHOLOGY
doi:10.1111/his.14867
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202303293270

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Aims: There is strong evidence that cribriform morphology indicates a worse prognosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Our aim was to investigate its interobserver reproducibility in prostate needle biopsies. Methods and results: A panel of nine prostate pathology experts from five continents independently reviewed 304 digitised biopsies for cribriform cancer according to recent International Society of Urological Pathology criteria. The biopsies were collected from a series of 702 biopsies that were reviewed by one of the panellists for enrichment of high-grade cancer and potentially cribriform structures. A 2/3 consensus diagnosis of cribriform and noncribriform cancer was reached in 90% (272/304) of the biopsies with a mean kappa value of 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.52–0.61). The prevalence of consensus cribriform cancers was estimated to 4%, 12%, 21%, and 20% of Gleason scores 7 (3 + 4), 7 (4 + 3), 8, and 9–10, respectively. More than two cribriform structures per level or a largest cribriform mass with ≥9 lumina or a diameter of ≥0.5 mm predicted a consensus diagnosis of cribriform cancer in 88% (70/80), 84% (87/103), and 90% (56/62), respectively, and noncribriform cancer in 3% (2/80), 5% (5/103), and 2% (1/62), respectively (all P < 0.01). Conclusion: Cribriform prostate cancer was seen in a minority of needle biopsies with high-grade cancer. Stringent diagnostic criteria enabled the identification of cribriform patterns and the generation of a large set of consensus cases for standardisation.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [22924]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste