Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

LWM2M for Cellular IoT: Protocol Implementation and Performance Evaluation

Dvorak, Radim; Jabloncik, Lukas; Mikulasek, Michal; Stusek, Martin; Masek, Pavel; Mozny, Radek; Ometov, Aleksandr; Mlynek, Petr; Cika, Petr; Hosek, Jiri (2023)

 
Avaa tiedosto
LWM2M_for_Cellular_IoT_Protocol_Implementation_and_Performance_Evaluation.pdf (405.2Kt)
Lataukset: 



Dvorak, Radim
Jabloncik, Lukas
Mikulasek, Michal
Stusek, Martin
Masek, Pavel
Mozny, Radek
Ometov, Aleksandr
Mlynek, Petr
Cika, Petr
Hosek, Jiri
2023

This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
doi:10.1109/icumt61075.2023.10333286
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-2023121410860

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
With the growing number of IoT devices, numerous IoT protocols are being developed to provide the market with options based on product requirements. With the release of cellular IoT (CIoT) technologies in the Czech Republic, recently LTE Cat-M, the focus shifts towards not only satisfying the requirements of the device application but also minimizing the generated traffic and overall co-existence of many devices under one cell. It led to the modification of the existing and the creation of new IoT protocols designed to generate as little overhead traffic as possible while adopting the existing well- known communication schemes. Namely, the new UDP-based protocol for IoT, LWM2M strives to be the alternative to the well-established IoT protocols used outside of CIoT. This paper explains the communication principles and capabilities of the well-established IoT protocols with a heavy focus on the LWM2M protocol. Further, it describes difficulties during user implementation of the LWM2M protocol. Furthermore, two carefully designed scenarios are used to compare the differences among these protocols, focusing on generated overhead as it is subject to a fee paid to the network operators within the CIoT networks.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20263]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste