Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Metabolomic Profiles of Nonobese and Obese Women With Gestational Diabetes

Sormunen-Harju, Heidi; Huvinen, Emilia; Girchenko, Polina V.; Kajantie, Eero; Villa, Pia M.; Hämäläinen, Esa K.; Lahti-Pulkkinen, Marius; Laivuori, Hannele; Räikkönen, Katri; Koivusalo, Saila B. (2023-11)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Metabolomic_Profiles_of_Nonobese_and_Obese_Women_With_Gestational_Diabetes.pdf (893.7Kt)
Lataukset: 



Sormunen-Harju, Heidi
Huvinen, Emilia
Girchenko, Polina V.
Kajantie, Eero
Villa, Pia M.
Hämäläinen, Esa K.
Lahti-Pulkkinen, Marius
Laivuori, Hannele
Räikkönen, Katri
Koivusalo, Saila B.
11 / 2023

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
doi:10.1210/clinem/dgad288
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202311099520

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>CONTEXT: In non-pregnant population, nonobese individuals with obesity-related metabolome have increased risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. The risk of these diseases is also increased after gestational diabetes. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to examine whether nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 30) and obese (BMI ≥ 30) women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and obese non-GDM women differ in metabolomic profiles from nonobese non-GDM controls. METHODS: Levels of 66 metabolic measures were assessed in early (median 13, IQR 12.4-13.7 gestation weeks), and across early, mid (20, 19.3-23.0), and late (28, 27.0-35.0) pregnancy blood samples in 755 pregnant women from the PREDO and RADIEL studies. The independent replication cohort comprised 490 pregnant women. RESULTS: Nonobese and obese GDM, and obese non-GDM women differed similarly from the controls across early, mid, and late pregnancy in 13 measures, including very low-density lipoprotein-related measures, and fatty acids. In 6 measures, including fatty acid (FA) ratios, glycolysis-related measures, valine, and 3-hydroxybutyrate, the differences between obese GDM women and controls were more pronounced than the differences between nonobese GDM or obese non-GDM women and controls. In 16 measures, including HDL-related measures, FA ratios, amino acids, and inflammation, differences between obese GDM or obese non-GDM women and controls were more pronounced than the differences between nonobese GDM women and controls. Most differences were evident in early pregnancy, and in the replication cohort were more often in the same direction than would be expected by chance alone. CONCLUSION: Differences between nonobese and obese GDM, or obese non-GDM women and controls in metabolomic profiles may allow detection of high-risk women for timely targeted preventive interventions.</p>
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20189]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste