Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
Trepo
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Trepo
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Does socioeconomic position moderate the associations between the content and delivery features of digital behaviour change interventions for smoking cessation and intervention effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Leppin, Corinna; Okpako, Tosan; Brown, Jamie; Garnett, Claire; Perski, Olga (2024)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Does_socioeconomic_position.pdf (4.197Mt)
Lataukset: 



Leppin, Corinna
Okpako, Tosan
Brown, Jamie
Garnett, Claire
Perski, Olga
2024

HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
doi:10.1080/17437199.2024.2366189
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-2024121911410

Kuvaus

Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Prior research indicates that digital smoking cessation interventions can be effective, but little is known about their active ingredients. Therefore, this review aimed to examine the associations of content (behaviour change techniques [BCTs]), delivery features (delivery mode, readability, ease-of-use), and socioeconomic position with effectiveness. Systematic searches and hand searches were conducted from February to June 2023 to identify experimental evaluations of digital smoking cessation interventions published since 2004. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to explore intervention effectiveness. Meta-CART were used to explore whether content, delivery features, or socioeconomic position moderate effectiveness and assessed interactions between potential moderators. Meta-regressions were performed as sensitivity checks. For k = 29 studies (n = 42,662), the authors provided sufficient data and materials for inclusion in the primary analyses. Participants in the intervention groups had greater odds of successfully quitting smoking (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10–1.51, p =.002) with similar effect sizes across socioeconomic groups (ORlow SEP= 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00–1.57, p =.048; ORhigh SEP= 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06–1.76, p =.017). No delivery features were significantly associated with effectiveness. The BCT ‘commitment’ was associated with larger effects in populations with high, but not low, socioeconomic positions. There were no significant interactions between potential moderators. Digital smoking cessation interventions are effective across socioeconomic groups. Uncertainty around active ingredients remains.
Kokoelmat
  • TUNICRIS-julkaisut [24152]
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

TekijätNimekkeetTiedekunta (2019 -)Tiedekunta (- 2018)Tutkinto-ohjelmat ja opintosuunnatAvainsanatJulkaisuajatKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Kalevantie 5
PL 617
33014 Tampereen yliopisto
oa[@]tuni.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste