Water Diplomacy in Central Asia: Discourse Analysis of the Rogun Dam
Hermano, Yesselin (2019)
Hermano, Yesselin
2019
Master's Degree Programme in Leadership for Change
Johtamisen ja talouden tiedekunta - Faculty of Management and Business
This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Hyväksymispäivämäärä
2019-11-26
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-201910284143
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-201910284143
Tiivistelmä
Water related conflicts are likely to increase due to global warming and population growth. The effects are greatly impacting regions such as Central Asia, where the territory is divided between upstream and downstream countries. Here, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have been disagreeing on the management of transboundary water since the dissolution of the Soviet Union and, in 2016, Tajikistan started to build the Rogun dam. The energy that will be produced from the dam will help Tajikistan to be independent from Uzbekistan’s imported petroleum resources. However, constructing the dam means decreasing the water intake of Uzbekistan, which can affect greatly the agriculture production of the country, the environment and the inhabitants living next to the water source. Thus, the relation between the two states have tightened up.
The purpose of this research is to study the Rogun dam case through the water diplomacy framework (WDF). The framework studies the complexities of water problems in the context of possible conflicting relations between entities that are involved in the transboundary water management. Using the WDF as an analytical tool, the research seeks to identify elements that can contribute to the political stability and peace between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
As discursive elements play a key role in diplomacy, discourse analysis was chosen as the method used to study the speeches and the official statements that are revolting around the Rogun dam project. The coding process is based on the elements of the WDF: values, interests and tools. The analysis involved categorizing the recurrent discourses used by the presidents of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, which led to understand their representations of the Rogun dam. From Tajikistan’s perspective, the following representations were identified: strength, symbol of the country, independency, energy supplier and national investment. From Uzbekistan’s perspective, the following were identified: political instrument, high-risk construction, water security and environmental problem, distrust but a possible point of reconciliation.
The data shows that Tajikistan has never changed its discourses concerning the dam throughout the years of planning the construction of the Rogun dam. Despite the high costs, the dam symbolizes the empowerment and the growth of the country, that are reached thanks to the contribution of the inhabitants and the national institutions. On the other hand, Uzbekistan has been hostile to the construction of the dam due to the great damage that it can cause to the country and to the environment. However, the research has also identified that with the new president Shavkat Mirziyoyev, who assumed office in December 2016, the discourse of Uzbekistan has changed. The president begun to establish a different foreign policy with neighboring countries, as a result of which the discourses of danger and threat of the Rogun dam have also disappeared in the last two years. This means that there has been a change in the discourses of Uzbekistan: from a discourse of distrust, now the discourse is shifting to a discourse of economic and political cooperation with Tajikistan. This discourse can also include the participation of the construction of the dam, which contributes significantly to the peace and stability of the two countries.
The purpose of this research is to study the Rogun dam case through the water diplomacy framework (WDF). The framework studies the complexities of water problems in the context of possible conflicting relations between entities that are involved in the transboundary water management. Using the WDF as an analytical tool, the research seeks to identify elements that can contribute to the political stability and peace between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
As discursive elements play a key role in diplomacy, discourse analysis was chosen as the method used to study the speeches and the official statements that are revolting around the Rogun dam project. The coding process is based on the elements of the WDF: values, interests and tools. The analysis involved categorizing the recurrent discourses used by the presidents of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, which led to understand their representations of the Rogun dam. From Tajikistan’s perspective, the following representations were identified: strength, symbol of the country, independency, energy supplier and national investment. From Uzbekistan’s perspective, the following were identified: political instrument, high-risk construction, water security and environmental problem, distrust but a possible point of reconciliation.
The data shows that Tajikistan has never changed its discourses concerning the dam throughout the years of planning the construction of the Rogun dam. Despite the high costs, the dam symbolizes the empowerment and the growth of the country, that are reached thanks to the contribution of the inhabitants and the national institutions. On the other hand, Uzbekistan has been hostile to the construction of the dam due to the great damage that it can cause to the country and to the environment. However, the research has also identified that with the new president Shavkat Mirziyoyev, who assumed office in December 2016, the discourse of Uzbekistan has changed. The president begun to establish a different foreign policy with neighboring countries, as a result of which the discourses of danger and threat of the Rogun dam have also disappeared in the last two years. This means that there has been a change in the discourses of Uzbekistan: from a discourse of distrust, now the discourse is shifting to a discourse of economic and political cooperation with Tajikistan. This discourse can also include the participation of the construction of the dam, which contributes significantly to the peace and stability of the two countries.