Intervention-related Deaths in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud; Remmers, Sebastiaan; Aus, Gunnar; Nelen, Vera; van Eycken, Liesbet; Villers, Arnauld; Rebillard, Xavier; Kwiatkowski, Maciej; Wyler, Stephen; Puliti, Donella; Gorini, Giuseppe; Paez, Alvaro; Lujan, Marcos; Tammela, Teuvo; Bangma, Chris; Auvinen, Anssi; Roobol, Monique J. (2021-12)
Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud
Remmers, Sebastiaan
Aus, Gunnar
Nelen, Vera
van Eycken, Liesbet
Villers, Arnauld
Rebillard, Xavier
Kwiatkowski, Maciej
Wyler, Stephen
Puliti, Donella
Gorini, Giuseppe
Paez, Alvaro
Lujan, Marcos
Tammela, Teuvo
Bangma, Chris
Auvinen, Anssi
Roobol, Monique J.
12 / 2021
European Urology Open Science
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202201251590
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202201251590
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
<p>Background: Identification of intervention-related deaths is important for an accurate assessment of the ratio of benefit to harm in screening trials. Objective: To investigate intervention-related deaths by study arm in the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening (ERSPC). Design, setting, and participants: ERSPC is a multicenter trial initiated in the 1990s to investigate whether screening on the basis of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can decrease prostate cancer mortality. The present study included men in the core age group (55–69 yr: screening group n = 112 553, control group n = 128 681) with 16-yr follow-up. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Causes of death among men with prostate cancer in ERSPC were predominantly evaluated by independent national committees via review of medical records according to a predefined algorithm. Intervention-related deaths were defined as deaths caused by complications during the screening procedure, treatment, or follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used for the results. Results and limitations: In total, 34 deaths were determined to be intervention-related, of which 21 were in the screening arm and 13 in the control arm. The overall risk of intervention-related death was 1.41 (95% confidence interval 0.99–1.99) per 10 000 randomized men for both arms combined and varied among centers from 0 to 7.0 per 10 000 randomized men. A limitation of this study is that differences in procedures among centers decreased the comparability of the results. Conclusions: Intervention-related deaths were rare in ERSPC. Monitoring of intervention-related deaths in screening trials is important for assessment of harms. Patient summary: We investigated deaths due to screening or treatment to assess harm in a trial of prostate cancer screening. Few such deaths were identified.</p>
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [20683]